You're the only person willing to consider this as a possibility so far on this site. Didn't think the_donald or conspiracies would be so close minded on the subject. It clearly isn't the original Dave Chappelle. It goes beyond weight gain.
Man, fuckers on here don't even want to confront the idea that Paul McCartney was replaced, let alone Dave Chapelle.
Dude is clearly not Dave. Different energy, different skin tone, height, build, vocal timbre, different sense of humour. And a really weird ass kissing of the DC "Elite" crowd.
Remember the fake publicity they drummed up for his Netflix special? Netflix are money sinks for the left of the left, including the Obamas and the pedo crowd. But they said that this lame-ass comedy special was "controversial!" just so people would tune in.
And what did they tune into? Fucking Impostor Dave who is a completely different man than the one who was exposing Hollywood, trying to condition the public into thinking that pedophilia is a good thing. That Obama and Kamala were these hip cool cats.
Definitely RIP Dace Chappelle. He 'disappears' to South Africa after turning down a $50 million contract, and his execs were trying to put him on anti-psychotics? Then after he spills the beans on Oprah, he's literally never seen again. Replaced with an imposter with facial constructive surgery, clone, or organic robotoid that they've been working on for decades. Check out this video of "Dave" in 2016 and listen to what he says about Muhammed Ali. https://youtu.be/HPL54AbYxkk?t=38
Also check out the comments. People know he's been replaced.
Those comments are based, by the way! It's good to see people wise to this.
The science of doubles has definitely progressed within the last few decades. They can create basically anything they want nowadays.
My biggest fascination is the process. Like, some feel like they were rush jobs. A panic-created double to appease public speculation. Others have more work put into them.
So many Hillaries circulated after the side of beef incident. I recall seeing a video of an ex-Clinton WH staffer even questioning the truth of Hillary well before that, noting that her eye color was inconsistent.
I feel like they hadn't anticipated Trumpian justice and that the 2016 Bill and Hillary actually were executed, or at least one set was.
The most interesting part is when they're fresh. Their first public performance.
For example, there's a 1967 interview which seems to be the first majorly rehearsed interview for the brand new Paul McCartney. But this was straight up CIA-style surgery and prosthetics, not the later Soviet cloning/robotoid techniques. So he's got some nervous tells. Sort of pulls at his ear and says "you know" at the end of most of his sentences.
It's fascinating from a societal/technological/ethical/spiritual perspective, but it's absolutely horrifying when you think of it.
We're basically in a world full of vampires and body snatchers.
I think that's really interesting. I knew about the Paul is Dead theory a long time ago but never gave it too much thought. If you look at these 2 photos of Paul side by side, its quite a change in facial structure for only 2 years having passed: https://shenandoahliterary.org/snopes/files/2015/04/beatles.png
Also I watched the 1967 interview where he is acting really strange, and someone counted he says "y'know" 53 times in 6 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C2y0iQXhQU
Ah, you're into the same realms of research. Assuming everything I've read about organic robotoids is true, I can imagine that it's implementation nowadays is much smoother than it was in the Jimmy Carter days, with advancements in biology and cloning research.
I'd go so far as to propose that the various Bills and Hillaries rotated around over the years were a series of organic robotoids themselves. There may have been real originals once, but I feel like any lust for power that is driven by Alinsky ideals would certainly put willing subjects into such a process (to gather the memory map).
Back onto Dave though, years ago there were videos everywhere claiming to be Dave's cousin who was saying he'd been replaced.
I believe there's video out there too of Jack Black saying that if you don't do what you're told, you're killed and replaced. I can't remember where I saw it.
So it's a pretty big incentive for people to stay locked in the horrific machine.
It's quite sick. What of the good-hearted? Do they argue with themselves that by actually going along with the plans they prevent an unchained replacement from doing even more evil?
I fail to see the real Dave Chapelle as an evil man. But this impostor... demon vibes.
The real Dave hasn't been seen since 2006, and I fully believe Killary has been replaced a number of times, she looks totally different every couple of times she rears her ugly head. She actually has several known body doubles: https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/1634_newscomau.pdf
Did you a full breakdown just now - it is the same Dave, although older. Check my comment when you have the time.
No, I think you just bought it without question and now you think anyone who disagrees is "close-minded", which is your own mistake. I've been working for a quality control in a very high company to compare faces and I can even spot cousins' similarities, but feel free to question anything I've presented. However, if you remain with this theory after my evidence to the contrary, you are the close-minded one and that is, in fact, the definition of close-minded person. So, don't just go arrogantly pushing your theory with incorrect evidence like you do now. This place should be for researchers and we should add up more to this if we can - I did my part, waiting for you to do yours.
I like how you basically say, "I'm right and anyone who disagrees with me is close-minded. I've only asked for people to consider the possibility, not automatically take my side without a though, which is what you're asking me to do. So I'm not totally convinced by your "cousin detecting skill at a large corporation". Sorry.
Go be delusional elsewhere, I already provided enough evidence in my initial comment. I like how you copy part of my reply to seem smart, would take more though but whatever. Good luck in 5th grade!
You're the only person willing to consider this as a possibility so far on this site. Didn't think the_donald or conspiracies would be so close minded on the subject. It clearly isn't the original Dave Chappelle. It goes beyond weight gain.
Man, fuckers on here don't even want to confront the idea that Paul McCartney was replaced, let alone Dave Chapelle.
Dude is clearly not Dave. Different energy, different skin tone, height, build, vocal timbre, different sense of humour. And a really weird ass kissing of the DC "Elite" crowd.
Remember the fake publicity they drummed up for his Netflix special? Netflix are money sinks for the left of the left, including the Obamas and the pedo crowd. But they said that this lame-ass comedy special was "controversial!" just so people would tune in.
And what did they tune into? Fucking Impostor Dave who is a completely different man than the one who was exposing Hollywood, trying to condition the public into thinking that pedophilia is a good thing. That Obama and Kamala were these hip cool cats.
All I can say is RIP Dave Chapelle.
Definitely RIP Dace Chappelle. He 'disappears' to South Africa after turning down a $50 million contract, and his execs were trying to put him on anti-psychotics? Then after he spills the beans on Oprah, he's literally never seen again. Replaced with an imposter with facial constructive surgery, clone, or organic robotoid that they've been working on for decades. Check out this video of "Dave" in 2016 and listen to what he says about Muhammed Ali. https://youtu.be/HPL54AbYxkk?t=38
Also check out the comments. People know he's been replaced.
Those comments are based, by the way! It's good to see people wise to this.
The science of doubles has definitely progressed within the last few decades. They can create basically anything they want nowadays.
My biggest fascination is the process. Like, some feel like they were rush jobs. A panic-created double to appease public speculation. Others have more work put into them.
So many Hillaries circulated after the side of beef incident. I recall seeing a video of an ex-Clinton WH staffer even questioning the truth of Hillary well before that, noting that her eye color was inconsistent.
I feel like they hadn't anticipated Trumpian justice and that the 2016 Bill and Hillary actually were executed, or at least one set was.
The most interesting part is when they're fresh. Their first public performance.
For example, there's a 1967 interview which seems to be the first majorly rehearsed interview for the brand new Paul McCartney. But this was straight up CIA-style surgery and prosthetics, not the later Soviet cloning/robotoid techniques. So he's got some nervous tells. Sort of pulls at his ear and says "you know" at the end of most of his sentences.
It's fascinating from a societal/technological/ethical/spiritual perspective, but it's absolutely horrifying when you think of it.
We're basically in a world full of vampires and body snatchers.
I think that's really interesting. I knew about the Paul is Dead theory a long time ago but never gave it too much thought. If you look at these 2 photos of Paul side by side, its quite a change in facial structure for only 2 years having passed: https://shenandoahliterary.org/snopes/files/2015/04/beatles.png
Also I watched the 1967 interview where he is acting really strange, and someone counted he says "y'know" 53 times in 6 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C2y0iQXhQU
Ah, you're into the same realms of research. Assuming everything I've read about organic robotoids is true, I can imagine that it's implementation nowadays is much smoother than it was in the Jimmy Carter days, with advancements in biology and cloning research.
I'd go so far as to propose that the various Bills and Hillaries rotated around over the years were a series of organic robotoids themselves. There may have been real originals once, but I feel like any lust for power that is driven by Alinsky ideals would certainly put willing subjects into such a process (to gather the memory map).
Back onto Dave though, years ago there were videos everywhere claiming to be Dave's cousin who was saying he'd been replaced.
I believe there's video out there too of Jack Black saying that if you don't do what you're told, you're killed and replaced. I can't remember where I saw it.
So it's a pretty big incentive for people to stay locked in the horrific machine.
It's quite sick. What of the good-hearted? Do they argue with themselves that by actually going along with the plans they prevent an unchained replacement from doing even more evil?
I fail to see the real Dave Chapelle as an evil man. But this impostor... demon vibes.
He absolutely is a demon. He likely lacks a soul if it really is a clone.
I found a clip of Jack Black claiming they'll clone you if you don't play ball with the hollyweird elites by the way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6jwXVk23s
Here's also an article with some of the information Dave's cousin gave about him not recognizing her soon after his Oprah interview took place: https://mtonews.com/mto-shocker-dave-chapelles-first-cousin-just-gave-interview-claims-dave-chapelle-see-now-really-clone-gotta-hear
The real Dave hasn't been seen since 2006, and I fully believe Killary has been replaced a number of times, she looks totally different every couple of times she rears her ugly head. She actually has several known body doubles: https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/1634_newscomau.pdf
Wow.
Yes.
Its one of the telltale signs. He looks scared shitless in the oprah interview.
the number of schills here is still incredibly high
user ciamm is certainly a schill (below in comments)
anyone that watches this... and knows anything sees the difference
Did you a full breakdown just now - it is the same Dave, although older. Check my comment when you have the time.
No, I think you just bought it without question and now you think anyone who disagrees is "close-minded", which is your own mistake. I've been working for a quality control in a very high company to compare faces and I can even spot cousins' similarities, but feel free to question anything I've presented. However, if you remain with this theory after my evidence to the contrary, you are the close-minded one and that is, in fact, the definition of close-minded person. So, don't just go arrogantly pushing your theory with incorrect evidence like you do now. This place should be for researchers and we should add up more to this if we can - I did my part, waiting for you to do yours.
I like how you basically say, "I'm right and anyone who disagrees with me is close-minded. I've only asked for people to consider the possibility, not automatically take my side without a though, which is what you're asking me to do. So I'm not totally convinced by your "cousin detecting skill at a large corporation". Sorry.
Go be delusional elsewhere, I already provided enough evidence in my initial comment. I like how you copy part of my reply to seem smart, would take more though but whatever. Good luck in 5th grade!