CCP at 100 Years: A Century of Killing and Deceit
(www.theepochtimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
a) you cannot blame government (mind control) without ignoring those who consented to it (those subjected to it) and the international usury cartel that sets governments up through the suggestion of -isms.
b) you warmonger against China; while defending this by pinpointing it onto the few among them (muh government); while also speak on the defense of mankind's favorite persecuted minority actors...and all the while not a peep about the many that are ruthlessly persecuted by the few. How is it that you not put mankind before the few who exploit it without mercy?
None of the few ever participate within a war; because only ever the many are steered into each other through the suggestions of the few, and you act as their ignorant mouthpiece...why?
c) how is it that your belief in antisemitism; without my consent to it, is enough to judge me through it? What's the -ism that protects the many from the few?
Btw...semitic from semi - "half" aka in opposition to half (anti-semitic) aka balance as form (resistance) within flow (velocity). Yet another sleight of hand for those who are not ignoring it for the suggested -ism.
Can you show an example of my "warmongering" against China?
Where have I judged you? I see what you did there.
Reasoning about the actions of any nation; while ignoring that no nation is controlled by what nation stands for (a people) is what implies the same consequences that consenting to reason about any suggested -ism leads to...conflict, self destruction; war.
The accusation of antisemitism implies the intended subjugation of free will of choice; which represents the choice of ignorance towards natural law, since free will cannot be subjugated; because it represents a response of form to flow. To choose represents to adapt to (as form to flow).
That is not what warmongering means.
Am I to understand that antisemitism is wrong according to you?
a) consenting to believe the suggestion of others does not build ones comprehension (understanding).
b) right vs wrong represents the conflict of reason; which is caused by consenting to believe the suggestions of others. Instead of reason (true vs false) utilize implication (if/then); which is in adherence to natural law (as defined by flow upon form). Also; guess who teaches that? The so called talmud.
c) the implication of consenting to any suggested -ism represents the ignorance over ones own sole authority over self...the free will of choice, for submission to the false authority of another aka believing the suggestion they offered with their free will of choice.
d) it represents one of the main suggested censorship tools to invert the persecuting acts of the few; by blaming the many for persecution.
Perpetuating anything about China; while ignoring the nation means "a people" and that the Chinese people are not in control of the nation called "China"; but subjugated under its name by the same international parasites that subjugate all other nations, will result in the usual war-racket.
In short...if choice of ignorance; then self destruction. The few racketeer that ignorance among the many by directing (through suggestion); harvesting (through actions in ignorance) and destroying (through the consequences of actions in ignorance) form through flow.