We actually have receptor sites designed for cannabis. They work to deliver all sorts of healing. Not at all how petrol based Rx interacts with receptor sites.
In the US these legal changes came about at the same time as prohibition was removed. And the Rockefeller Foundation was creating big pharma. The AMA objected, horrified that it meant all they'd have to use was petroleum based. Before that everything they used was cannabis based. They lost.
It's only a bad argument if you misuse it as you are doing. This isn't a discussion trying to overturn prohibition that I'm engaging in.
I'm not imagining any evolutionary purpose. Saying a receptor is compatible with cannabis but is not a cannabis receptor is hair splitting to a ridiculous degree. There's a reason why healing benefits from this plant are especially effective.
We actually have receptor sites designed for cannabis. They work to deliver all sorts of healing. Not at all how petrol based Rx interacts with receptor sites.
In the US these legal changes came about at the same time as prohibition was removed. And the Rockefeller Foundation was creating big pharma. The AMA objected, horrified that it meant all they'd have to use was petroleum based. Before that everything they used was cannabis based. They lost.
It's only a bad argument if you misuse it as you are doing. This isn't a discussion trying to overturn prohibition that I'm engaging in.
I'm not imagining any evolutionary purpose. Saying a receptor is compatible with cannabis but is not a cannabis receptor is hair splitting to a ridiculous degree. There's a reason why healing benefits from this plant are especially effective.
Rank stinking teleology - to ask why of nature.
Excuse me but asking why is the very basis of logic and reason. Without that we accomplish nothing.
Although your response has nothing to do with my comment.
One might wonder why and from where the concept of teleology comes? Have you any formal training in logic / philosophy? Thought not.