It only really makes sense if depopulation is taken into account.
If some of them are legitimately concerned about the utopia collapse, and want to control it to make sure they and their wealth and power survive it.
They determined collapse was inevitable. They determined a turning would happen, and nothing would be the same after the collapse. They determined that their wealth (assets) would not survive, and there was increased risk they and their bloodlines would not survive.
What happens to international wealth when governments collapse? All the assets go back to the hands of the people. New governments form, and they take that wealth back for themselves.
The Elite determined population control was required to delay it, but it could not be prevented without population reduction. So they decided to engineer a collapse of their own making, so they could control the outcome.
It remains to be seen whether the Great Reset is merely a stepping stone towards further control and replacing the debt backed system with a single digital currency and social credit score, to be followed by a depopulation event. Or if the injection is the trigger for the depop people have been warning about for decades.
Very effective at achieving a rapid, but no too fast reduction.
Create a new "panic" for taking more control. Ala, Children of Men.
But, sterilization would bring a LOT of risks.
People WILL notice. Those people will still be alive, and pissed off.
Blame will be shifted internationally and hard to control.
Wars will happen.
Now, either those WARS are the goal, which will only further reduce the population and can be used to secure even more control by the winning parties. Or, there is something even more nefarious at hand that will cause a more rapid decline in population.
The goal may only be to initialize the conditions for a collapse, and watch it happen. Lockdown isolation and polarization and diversification of society are the preconditions for collapse. When society stops functioning as a society and they only thing they do is stuff their gobs, cliquing and direct withdrawal from social interaction are the main precursors. Then comes violence.
Sterilization may even be engineered for the purpose of controlling the population on the other side of the collapse. That way they can "rebuild" society in short order, in their own vision of what that society should be, and then not have to worry about a post collapse population boom putting us back into the 1930's problem all over again.
the majority of ppl in the first world dont care what gets done to them, as long as they have a concrete, known social status value. and by the time anyone notices, it will be too late, as i suspect it already is. if ppl didnt insurrect over a bioattack coordinated between the US and China, they'll never do it; not advocating violence here, just saying no one would do anything, and if they did it would justify the martial law stuff. [they] win either way.
It only really makes sense if depopulation is taken into account.
If some of them are legitimately concerned about the utopia collapse, and want to control it to make sure they and their wealth and power survive it.
They determined collapse was inevitable. They determined a turning would happen, and nothing would be the same after the collapse. They determined that their wealth (assets) would not survive, and there was increased risk they and their bloodlines would not survive.
What happens to international wealth when governments collapse? All the assets go back to the hands of the people. New governments form, and they take that wealth back for themselves.
The Elite determined population control was required to delay it, but it could not be prevented without population reduction. So they decided to engineer a collapse of their own making, so they could control the outcome.
It remains to be seen whether the Great Reset is merely a stepping stone towards further control and replacing the debt backed system with a single digital currency and social credit score, to be followed by a depopulation event. Or if the injection is the trigger for the depop people have been warning about for decades.
the vaxx sterilization fits in here?
Sterilization with the not-a-vax would be:
But, sterilization would bring a LOT of risks.
Now, either those WARS are the goal, which will only further reduce the population and can be used to secure even more control by the winning parties. Or, there is something even more nefarious at hand that will cause a more rapid decline in population.
The goal may only be to initialize the conditions for a collapse, and watch it happen. Lockdown isolation and polarization and diversification of society are the preconditions for collapse. When society stops functioning as a society and they only thing they do is stuff their gobs, cliquing and direct withdrawal from social interaction are the main precursors. Then comes violence.
Sterilization may even be engineered for the purpose of controlling the population on the other side of the collapse. That way they can "rebuild" society in short order, in their own vision of what that society should be, and then not have to worry about a post collapse population boom putting us back into the 1930's problem all over again.
the majority of ppl in the first world dont care what gets done to them, as long as they have a concrete, known social status value. and by the time anyone notices, it will be too late, as i suspect it already is. if ppl didnt insurrect over a bioattack coordinated between the US and China, they'll never do it; not advocating violence here, just saying no one would do anything, and if they did it would justify the martial law stuff. [they] win either way.
Not believing their masters was all the sheep had to do