No other name has the authority to cast out demons. You can't tell a devil to leave in the name of Buddha or Mohammad. You can't cause a demon to flee at the name of Krishna. Jesus is the only name by which you can cast out demons, and there is no other authority by which all things fall under command. He is the ultimate authority, and every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus is LORD.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
If free will of choice represents a tool of consent between ONE and ALL; which allows ONE to choose to ignore ALL; then this tool is defined by the balance of choice...adherence to ALL (need) or ignorance of ALL (want).
If balance; then momentum within motion; because balance is defined by adaptation to movement aka choice (free will) based adaptation as form to flow.
Now, if flow defines form as being within balance; doesn't balance shift the value of authority onto the sustenance of ONEself within ALL?
Free will of choice represents sole authority over ONEself within ALL; yet the "free" implies freedom aka "free" will of choice under the "dominion" of flow (motion) upon form (momentum).
Flow equals change; naming; branding; idolizing form represents the choice to ignore change for affixed beliefs suggested by those within form...those who act in the name of theses idol; who act "in nomine" patris (ALL) et filii (ONE) et spiritus sancti (balance).
Most believers will agree that the infrastructure of religion is corrupt; yet when I point out the consent by free will of choice to suggested beliefs is what's establishing the infrastructure; the chain of command under false authority; the consent towards others using their free will to act in the name of the suggested beliefs...then the believers tend to become hostile; because they cannot agree without acknowledging their own choice of ignorance and the consequences thereof.
Answer me this...if free will offers dominion over self, and if that includes ignores towards ALL; then why are others blamed for the consequences of ignorance?
ONE within ALL implies that ALL is ONE in energy; but branding each as authorities corrupts ONEs comprehension of that.
ok
you are held accountable for your own choices
Form represents a response to flow, so acting upon free will of choice aka balancing as form within flow represents ONEs responsibility over ONEself within ALL.
It is the consequences of all actions that represent the collective inspiration towards adhering to the individual responsibility over free will of choice; over the sustenance of self.
ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit". The debt represents the balance between ONE (form) and ALL (flow) needed for the sustenance of self, and the credit (from creed; belief; faith) represents the ignorance thereof.
The real currency for form represents flow; which puts the highest value on the ONE within ALL...the ONE with the free will of choice of "evaluation" within ALL.
ok
Okay denotes approval aka ONEs consent by free will of choice to suggested offer by another ONE. I didn't offer; I adapted to inspiration (within form) in adherence to ALL (within flow).
The again; did you use "ok" for approval or did you use it as a justification for ignorance? The latter would make the use of the word a contradiction in itself.