So choosing by free will of choice to ignore free-will-of choice...it's your choice.
I personally comprehended very little.
Are others responsible for ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived? What if you as form within flow represent a response to flow? Would that define your free will of choice (as form within flow) as a responsibility over self?
"So choosing by free will of choice to ignore free-will-of choice...it's your choice"
Yes, I chose to skip it because It was unreadable. And nobody has the time, or motivation to dive into your meta logic. In addition, it would numb my thought processes. In fact, unless you are a bot, then this process you are engaging in is damaging your own ability to think, and perceive the world.
"Are others responsible for ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived?"
Yes. Now allow me to explain. Simplicity an prevailed she mirth make wife new so true Felicity does society on breakfast. Could two so continual begin something compact need estimating two how jokes yet formerly west myself for she gay should pure he Garden His Money ecstatic happy mile, "ستمر"? I wished questions say desirous why other pianoforte check an totally an not after middle tons Direct match.
Now if you didn't understand that, it is clearly your fault. Why don't you take responsibly for you own failure? Honestly though, your best action would have been to skip that paragraph, and if you don't understand why by now, then you truly are a lost duck.
Yes, I chose to skip it because It was unreadable.
So you comprehend little; skip a lot, and blame the perceived for the consequences of your own actions. What are the implications of doing the same within reality?
And nobody has
Proclaiming in the name of others; while ignoring individual free will of choice. Why is it that you comprehend little of what you perceive; but have no reservation proclaiming reality for all others?
time
A measurement of motion that suggests the inversion of motion with affixed states (past; present; future). What if we are form within flow? Wouldn't then contemplating upon that which was and that which might be; ignore that which is?
motivation
Self sustenance represents the motive power for all existence, so your existence is defined by motivation.
your meta logic
Your - ignorance of coexistence as ONE within ALL.
Meta - after aka form (momentum) after flow (motion)
Logic - Reason aka the conflict between truth versus false; based on the ignorance of flow.
it would numb my thought processes.
Process as in processing - that represents adaptation to flow
Numb - "destitute of the power of sensation and motion" aka ignorance towards flow.
Could comprehending little; while skipping lot; based on choice of ignorance corrupt the power of motion flowing through self?
this process you are engaging in is damaging your own ability to think, and perceive the world
See, adaptation to inspiration curtails thinking, which represents holding onto information; while I allow my consciousness to operate less restricted by direct adaptation to flow; to the flow of ALL information offered to out perception as inspiration.
Whenever I catch myself thinking; I resist by generating motion to inspire the need for adaptation (balance); which brings me back from stagnation to adaptation.
Now allow me to explain
ALLOW', verb transitive (Latin loco, to lay, set, place). You were already set as form into flow; which is why you have a free will of choice aka the sole authority over ONEself within ALL. Question why you believe in the false authority of others who would not allow you to explain?
Now if you didn't understand that, it is clearly your fault.
Flow doesn't offer words to define form; it allows form to resonate with flow; which allows sound; out of which form "forms" words within flow. What form perceives comes from flow; not through the suggestions of other form; who use words to describe flow. Adaptation as form to flow is what builds comprehension of the perceived; while believing the suggested words for other form corrupts comprehension.
As for fault...there's no error within flow; the form within just lacks comprehension about what flow means, and building that comprehension represents form responding to flow aka responsibility of form to flow.
Why don't you take responsibly for you own failure?
One cannot fail life; because the outcome (death) was predefined when the beginning (inception) was set into motion. Responsibility represents over self sustenance through adaptation by choice of action for balance in motion.
Taking also represents ignorance over having free will of choice to use ALL, not to claim (take) any other ONE. Form cannot claim form within flow without ignoring flow.
your best action would have been to skip that paragraph
What if reality is what ONE chooses to make out of it within ALL; instead of the proclamations other ONEs suggest ONE to consent to believe?
you truly are a lost duck.
You seem to perceive a reality where another is a "silly goose + lost duck" and yet it doesn't inspire you to question your own comprehension...then again; a lost duck makes one silly goose. One might say even an 'ugly duckling'.
I personaly comprehended very little. As I skipped over large sections of your text.
This seems to be simple Word Association.
You are not a very good duck.
And what have we learned(did not)?
So choosing by free will of choice to ignore free-will-of choice...it's your choice.
Are others responsible for ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived? What if you as form within flow represent a response to flow? Would that define your free will of choice (as form within flow) as a responsibility over self?
Yes, I chose to skip it because It was unreadable. And nobody has the time, or motivation to dive into your meta logic. In addition, it would numb my thought processes. In fact, unless you are a bot, then this process you are engaging in is damaging your own ability to think, and perceive the world.
Yes. Now allow me to explain. Simplicity an prevailed she mirth make wife new so true Felicity does society on breakfast. Could two so continual begin something compact need estimating two how jokes yet formerly west myself for she gay should pure he Garden His Money ecstatic happy mile, "ستمر"? I wished questions say desirous why other pianoforte check an totally an not after middle tons Direct match.
Now if you didn't understand that, it is clearly your fault. Why don't you take responsibly for you own failure? Honestly though, your best action would have been to skip that paragraph, and if you don't understand why by now, then you truly are a lost duck.
So you comprehend little; skip a lot, and blame the perceived for the consequences of your own actions. What are the implications of doing the same within reality?
Proclaiming in the name of others; while ignoring individual free will of choice. Why is it that you comprehend little of what you perceive; but have no reservation proclaiming reality for all others?
A measurement of motion that suggests the inversion of motion with affixed states (past; present; future). What if we are form within flow? Wouldn't then contemplating upon that which was and that which might be; ignore that which is?
Self sustenance represents the motive power for all existence, so your existence is defined by motivation.
Your - ignorance of coexistence as ONE within ALL. Meta - after aka form (momentum) after flow (motion) Logic - Reason aka the conflict between truth versus false; based on the ignorance of flow.
Process as in processing - that represents adaptation to flow Numb - "destitute of the power of sensation and motion" aka ignorance towards flow.
Could comprehending little; while skipping lot; based on choice of ignorance corrupt the power of motion flowing through self?
See, adaptation to inspiration curtails thinking, which represents holding onto information; while I allow my consciousness to operate less restricted by direct adaptation to flow; to the flow of ALL information offered to out perception as inspiration.
Whenever I catch myself thinking; I resist by generating motion to inspire the need for adaptation (balance); which brings me back from stagnation to adaptation.
ALLOW', verb transitive (Latin loco, to lay, set, place). You were already set as form into flow; which is why you have a free will of choice aka the sole authority over ONEself within ALL. Question why you believe in the false authority of others who would not allow you to explain?
Flow doesn't offer words to define form; it allows form to resonate with flow; which allows sound; out of which form "forms" words within flow. What form perceives comes from flow; not through the suggestions of other form; who use words to describe flow. Adaptation as form to flow is what builds comprehension of the perceived; while believing the suggested words for other form corrupts comprehension.
As for fault...there's no error within flow; the form within just lacks comprehension about what flow means, and building that comprehension represents form responding to flow aka responsibility of form to flow.
One cannot fail life; because the outcome (death) was predefined when the beginning (inception) was set into motion. Responsibility represents over self sustenance through adaptation by choice of action for balance in motion.
Taking also represents ignorance over having free will of choice to use ALL, not to claim (take) any other ONE. Form cannot claim form within flow without ignoring flow.
What if reality is what ONE chooses to make out of it within ALL; instead of the proclamations other ONEs suggest ONE to consent to believe?
You seem to perceive a reality where another is a "silly goose + lost duck" and yet it doesn't inspire you to question your own comprehension...then again; a lost duck makes one silly goose. One might say even an 'ugly duckling'.