A suggestion enacted by the few to entice the many to consent to ignore needed adherence to self sustenance for wanted temptation.
A spectacle suggests spectators to ignore reality for fiction by choice of action. Underneath operates offer/consent defined by natural law. Others suggest spectacle to distract those they want to exploit to consent (by free will of chocie) to ignore reality (laws of nature) for fiction (laws of men), which is why whenever a spectacle fails to tempt spectators; the fictitious laws of men are utilized to put the agitated many back into the state of ignorance.
what actually happened?
This want for information from others; while ignoring inspiration from nature is what the few are exploiting within the many through suggestions. Want over need; information over inspiration and reason (true vs false) over implication (if/then)...they use suggestion to invert human comprehension of reality by suggesting the opposite of reality...fiction aka the ignorance of reality.
It isn't. I adapt to inspiration to build my comprehension, which represents the communication between ONE and ALL; not between ONE and other ONEs. You read text on a screen; believe it to be a form of communication and try to confront the source of whatever you don't comprehend. Those represent your choices towards another ONE; which are in ignorance of ALL.
You're not alone in that ignorance; and technology is used as a suggestion to deceive all of humanity to consent to that ignorance; which in return allows those who make the suggestions to control those who consent to it.
make any kind of sense
Your senses is what you perceive input with, and you perceive input to build comprehension (processing) so that you can act upon the perceived (ALL potentiality); based on your own comprehension (ONEs potential).
We're being deceived to attack source of information; while ignoring that it's always offered to our perception by ALL. What you perceive represents the source of ALL information, and your comprehension of it is what's representing the limitation in this world. Others are using suggestion to keep you ignorant of ALL; so that you believe them; which in return corrupts you to comprehend ALL perceived information.
one of the few times the words you string together make any kind of sense
What specifically did you comprehend and what not?
So choosing by free will of choice to ignore free-will-of choice...it's your choice.
I personally comprehended very little.
Are others responsible for ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived? What if you as form within flow represent a response to flow? Would that define your free will of choice (as form within flow) as a responsibility over self?
A suggestion enacted by the few to entice the many to consent to ignore needed adherence to self sustenance for wanted temptation.
A spectacle suggests spectators to ignore reality for fiction by choice of action. Underneath operates offer/consent defined by natural law. Others suggest spectacle to distract those they want to exploit to consent (by free will of chocie) to ignore reality (laws of nature) for fiction (laws of men), which is why whenever a spectacle fails to tempt spectators; the fictitious laws of men are utilized to put the agitated many back into the state of ignorance.
This want for information from others; while ignoring inspiration from nature is what the few are exploiting within the many through suggestions. Want over need; information over inspiration and reason (true vs false) over implication (if/then)...they use suggestion to invert human comprehension of reality by suggesting the opposite of reality...fiction aka the ignorance of reality.
It isn't. I adapt to inspiration to build my comprehension, which represents the communication between ONE and ALL; not between ONE and other ONEs. You read text on a screen; believe it to be a form of communication and try to confront the source of whatever you don't comprehend. Those represent your choices towards another ONE; which are in ignorance of ALL.
You're not alone in that ignorance; and technology is used as a suggestion to deceive all of humanity to consent to that ignorance; which in return allows those who make the suggestions to control those who consent to it.
Your senses is what you perceive input with, and you perceive input to build comprehension (processing) so that you can act upon the perceived (ALL potentiality); based on your own comprehension (ONEs potential).
We're being deceived to attack source of information; while ignoring that it's always offered to our perception by ALL. What you perceive represents the source of ALL information, and your comprehension of it is what's representing the limitation in this world. Others are using suggestion to keep you ignorant of ALL; so that you believe them; which in return corrupts you to comprehend ALL perceived information.
What specifically did you comprehend and what not?
I personaly comprehended very little. As I skipped over large sections of your text.
This seems to be simple Word Association.
You are not a very good duck.
And what have we learned(did not)?
So choosing by free will of choice to ignore free-will-of choice...it's your choice.
Are others responsible for ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived? What if you as form within flow represent a response to flow? Would that define your free will of choice (as form within flow) as a responsibility over self?
Fuck off