Well, according to this graph, 25 million more people voted in '92 than in '88, and 20 million more voted in '04 than in '00. 26 million isn't that out of place on this graph. This graph also doesn't tell me what the population is each election, or what the voter participation rate is. So as far as this graph shows, it's just the US population growing in spurts.
Maybe you made some typos? Maybe you'd like to add more data and context to your graph? This latest election has 99% voter turnout in some districts, which is more than Maduro and Castro ever had, and is a universally-recognized, guaranteed sign of fraud around the world.
It’s not substantial restive to previous data though. Both the ‘88-‘92 and ‘00-‘04 cycles have significant growth that, when set relative to the voting eligible population at that time, is similar to the growth in ‘16-‘20.
Well, according to this graph, 25 million more people voted in '92 than in '88, and 20 million more voted in '04 than in '00. 26 million isn't that out of place on this graph. This graph also doesn't tell me what the population is each election, or what the voter participation rate is. So as far as this graph shows, it's just the US population growing in spurts.
Maybe you made some typos? Maybe you'd like to add more data and context to your graph? This latest election has 99% voter turnout in some districts, which is more than Maduro and Castro ever had, and is a universally-recognized, guaranteed sign of fraud around the world.
Just pointing out that your argument is, literally, that increased voter turnout means fraud.
It’s not substantial restive to previous data though. Both the ‘88-‘92 and ‘00-‘04 cycles have significant growth that, when set relative to the voting eligible population at that time, is similar to the growth in ‘16-‘20.