live virus/attenuated coronavirus vaccines were met with failure
In what way were they met with failure? What efficacy? Where was it tested? Why couldn't a dead one be used? If this is just gene sequences, couldn't they just manufacture the right sequences?
All of these questions lead to the same answer. Just like CDC admits on their website, the genome the world has accepted is in silico.
There was considerable effort towards developing coronavirus vaccines in the 80s and 90s. None made it out of animal trails because of ADE and other problems.
The virus is real. But wildly exaggerated. It's a big cash grab for big pharma at best and a demented population reduction totalitarian overthrow at worst.
Many of the diseases are real, however the idea of a virus itself might not be how it actually spreads. The term "virus" predates the modern definition by over a century. If you study the source material for the current explanation for what the virus is, you cannot find verifiable proof.
Yes there are a lot of diseases, but the medical community doesn't actually know the actual mechanisms of many viral diseases. The concept of a coronavirus, if what they publish is anything like their source, is just idle speculation.
In what way were they met with failure? What efficacy? Where was it tested? Why couldn't a dead one be used? If this is just gene sequences, couldn't they just manufacture the right sequences?
All of these questions lead to the same answer. Just like CDC admits on their website, the genome the world has accepted is in silico.
There was considerable effort towards developing coronavirus vaccines in the 80s and 90s. None made it out of animal trails because of ADE and other problems.
The virus is real. But wildly exaggerated. It's a big cash grab for big pharma at best and a demented population reduction totalitarian overthrow at worst.
Many of the diseases are real, however the idea of a virus itself might not be how it actually spreads. The term "virus" predates the modern definition by over a century. If you study the source material for the current explanation for what the virus is, you cannot find verifiable proof.
Yes there are a lot of diseases, but the medical community doesn't actually know the actual mechanisms of many viral diseases. The concept of a coronavirus, if what they publish is anything like their source, is just idle speculation.