It's called vaccine cause they used to get the injection from a cow. The word since changed deifinition because they introduced the new definition of a virus.
Is a cow a cow because we brand that life-form as such, and does the life-form change if we rebrand it?
Could it be that nature doesn't use words; brands; idols to communicate itself to us; but instead uses the consequences of actions set into motion to communicate inspiration to our senses?
Only we are selfishly proclaiming "I am..." and "this is...", while ignoring that to make any proclamations we need something that already is existing; to make proclamations about.
We represent form within flow, and by trying to brand form we ignore flow...ignorance of reality for believe in fiction.
Who's offering us the definitions of all words in exchange for consent to believe them? Who's suggesting to us that "in the beginning was the word..."; while demanding us to have "faith" towards this? Who has the power of infrastructure required to mass propagandize -isms to us? Could it be that the few who control the many through lies are generated by the many who believe in truth?
Could it be that consent to believe any suggestion is what causes the conflict of reason (truth versus false)...a conflict that does not exist within motion? Doesn't suggested "time" measure motion, and if so, then wouldn't the affixed states of past, present and future not only contradict motion, but corrupt those who consent to believe them?
Who would have the audacity to not only trick mankind to ignore reality, but to rub it in their noses when calling them goyim; cattle; cows; while suggesting them vaccines (from vacca; cow)?
the new definition of a virus.
Can ONE create anything "new" without using inspiration from ALL that already is? Try it; try to form a thought that isn't based on what inspired you to think about. You can't, because ALL existence represents predefined information; which you; the ONE within ALL simply lack comprehension of. There's no such thing as new/old within motion; others just trick you to believe they are.
VI'RUS, noun [Latin See Virulent.] Foul or contagious matter of an ulcer, postule, etc.; poison.
VIR'ULENT, adjective [Latin virulentus, from virus, poison, that is, strength, from the same root as vir, vireo. See Venom.] - "extremely active in doing injury; very poisonous or venomous".
VEN'OM, noun [Latin venenum, venor, to hunt, to drive or chase; venio, to come.] - "poison; matter fatal or injurious to life".
Will you ever stop believing the suggestions of others and start adhering to self sustenance within ALL motion? You are being tricked to consent to self destruction, by believing others who define reality for you. they exploit our ignorance, and our ignorance caused; sustains and inspires them to ruthlessly continue.
definition
What if nature defines itself through motion; which defines the rules for all the ones within? What will it take for you to challenge your self imposed beliefs for the implication of a reality within motion?
It's called vaccine cause they used to get the injection from a cow. The word since changed deifinition because they introduced the new definition of a virus.
Is a cow a cow because we brand that life-form as such, and does the life-form change if we rebrand it?
Could it be that nature doesn't use words; brands; idols to communicate itself to us; but instead uses the consequences of actions set into motion to communicate inspiration to our senses?
Only we are selfishly proclaiming "I am..." and "this is...", while ignoring that to make any proclamations we need something that already is existing; to make proclamations about.
We represent form within flow, and by trying to brand form we ignore flow...ignorance of reality for believe in fiction.
Who's offering us the definitions of all words in exchange for consent to believe them? Who's suggesting to us that "in the beginning was the word..."; while demanding us to have "faith" towards this? Who has the power of infrastructure required to mass propagandize -isms to us? Could it be that the few who control the many through lies are generated by the many who believe in truth?
Could it be that consent to believe any suggestion is what causes the conflict of reason (truth versus false)...a conflict that does not exist within motion? Doesn't suggested "time" measure motion, and if so, then wouldn't the affixed states of past, present and future not only contradict motion, but corrupt those who consent to believe them?
Who would have the audacity to not only trick mankind to ignore reality, but to rub it in their noses when calling them goyim; cattle; cows; while suggesting them vaccines (from vacca; cow)?
Can ONE create anything "new" without using inspiration from ALL that already is? Try it; try to form a thought that isn't based on what inspired you to think about. You can't, because ALL existence represents predefined information; which you; the ONE within ALL simply lack comprehension of. There's no such thing as new/old within motion; others just trick you to believe they are.
VI'RUS, noun [Latin See Virulent.] Foul or contagious matter of an ulcer, postule, etc.; poison.
VIR'ULENT, adjective [Latin virulentus, from virus, poison, that is, strength, from the same root as vir, vireo. See Venom.] - "extremely active in doing injury; very poisonous or venomous".
VEN'OM, noun [Latin venenum, venor, to hunt, to drive or chase; venio, to come.] - "poison; matter fatal or injurious to life".
Will you ever stop believing the suggestions of others and start adhering to self sustenance within ALL motion? You are being tricked to consent to self destruction, by believing others who define reality for you. they exploit our ignorance, and our ignorance caused; sustains and inspires them to ruthlessly continue.
What if nature defines itself through motion; which defines the rules for all the ones within? What will it take for you to challenge your self imposed beliefs for the implication of a reality within motion?