Once again your pee brain assumes a conspiracy when the truth is more plausible.
The camera's video format was incompatible with existing NTSC, PAL, and SECAM broadcast television standards. It needed to be converted before it could be shown on broadcast television networks. This live conversion was crude, essentially using a video camera pointing at a high-quality 10-inch TV monitor.
Isn't it convenient that it wasn't possible to show the direct footage, allegedly obtained from the moon's surface and in orbit around it? And wasn't it compoundingly* convenient that the telemetry tapes, which few seem to realize actually contained ALL the data obtained from space during the Apollo missions, including the filmed footage (which was displayed on monitors, in turn filmed by TV cameras for broadcast, as you said); isn't it convenient that those telemetry tapes disappered completely, never to be found again, and all we are left with is the second hand documentation?
IMO one might start to entirely question the actual, original existence of those telemetry tapes... they could have been ordinary film footage... and as such faked.
Isn’t it convenient you tin foilers can’t understand a joker spread a hoax 40 years ago that the moon landing was faked and you still think it’s true. The shill is you for continuing to support a hoax. Only moron faced with a massive mountain of evidence continue to deny its existence.
Once again your pee brain assumes a conspiracy when the truth is more plausible.
The camera's video format was incompatible with existing NTSC, PAL, and SECAM broadcast television standards. It needed to be converted before it could be shown on broadcast television networks. This live conversion was crude, essentially using a video camera pointing at a high-quality 10-inch TV monitor.
This is not a defense of a flat earth hypothesis
Isn't it convenient that it wasn't possible to show the direct footage, allegedly obtained from the moon's surface and in orbit around it? And wasn't it compoundingly* convenient that the telemetry tapes, which few seem to realize actually contained ALL the data obtained from space during the Apollo missions, including the filmed footage (which was displayed on monitors, in turn filmed by TV cameras for broadcast, as you said); isn't it convenient that those telemetry tapes disappered completely, never to be found again, and all we are left with is the second hand documentation?
IMO one might start to entirely question the actual, original existence of those telemetry tapes... they could have been ordinary film footage... and as such faked.
Isn’t it convenient you tin foilers can’t understand a joker spread a hoax 40 years ago that the moon landing was faked and you still think it’s true. The shill is you for continuing to support a hoax. Only moron faced with a massive mountain of evidence continue to deny its existence.
That's an interesting way to phrase it. Another way would be 'a whistleblower came forward 40 years ago...'