38
posted ago by ghost_of_aswartz ago by ghost_of_aswartz +40 / -2

Saying "anti-vax" implies it's a vax. It's NOT a vax. It's a gene mutagen. It's a GMO injection. It's experimental. It's dangerous and unwarranted, esp since therapeutics exist.

We only want what was good enough for our president: HCQ, Invermectin, monoclonal antibodies Regeneron, cortisol steroids and some other trash.

With the exception of monoclonal antibodies, regeneron these things, are inexpensive. Personal therapy is complex and expensive. No small wonder why they'd need a one-size-fits all vat of cheap mRNA, bubbling green darkness to inject into everyone--much higher profits!

But personal therapy is better. They take your cells and make antibodies using them and put them back into you. That's my simplified dum dum explanation, feel free to take a hot crap on this explanation if you're a scientist--i will allow it!

No

It's not a vaccine

It's a gene therapy at best, genetically-modifying mutagen at the worst. It's experimental.

We aren't "hesitants" or "hesitanteers" or some thing. Hesitating implies that you're going to be convinced. You probably won't be

If you're like me you're not anti vax. Again, it's not a vax

If they made a traditional, attenuated SARS-COV2 vaccine, I'd take it. Possibly even if they still put mercury thimerosol in it, even though that's super stupid since squalene exists.