Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

44
Some conspiracy theories exist only to discredit the real ones (media.communities.win)
posted 4 years ago by eagleheart585 4 years ago by eagleheart585 +47 / -3
36 comments download share
36 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 1 point 4 years ago +6 / -5

Stonehenge a hoax. Bult in the 1950s

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=stonehenge+built+in+1954&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Love_Over_Fear 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

It was restored in the 1950s, it was there in the 1800s. Links below - check the change in the stones. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=stonehenge+1800s&t=brave&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images&iai=http%3A%2F%2F78.media.tumblr.com%2F92c2eb19a149e24129f9639e5b4d8fe4%2Ftumblr_o619qjiXTM1r0bqbdo1_1280.jpg

https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/inspire-me/blog/blog-posts/2018/excavation-restoration-stonehenge-1950s-60s/

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=stonehenge&t=brave&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fmymodernmet.com%2Fwp%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F04%2Fwho-built-stonehenge-2.jpg

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Allas8 -1 points 4 years ago +4 / -5

The wind probably kept knocking it down, so they had to make their hoax a bit more sturdy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– formerdemfortrump 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Couldn't this be settled by looking for the first written statements about Stonehenge? If we try to locate the first written acknowledgment of Stonehenge, then we can determine if it existed before 1950.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Allas8 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Nothing of Stonehenge in British literature as far as I know. Shakespeare never wrote about it.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– Love_Over_Fear 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Look, I clicked your link and at first I was shocked. I tried to discuss this with my gf, telling her that this is truth. Later she discovered some photos and thanks to her, I can clearly see the stones in the 1800s, there is a webpage on the restoration, it makes sense for occult sects to use it and that's why there are pictures of the masonic fanatics there.

That's my story of how I believed something and just by some digging, my gf protected me from the lie. Believe what you want, but we must rely on facts alone. How can you explain the pictures from 1800?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Current Stonehenge was built in the 50s, but it is not the first time they built this hoax. The stone probably kept getting knocked over do to strong wind, so they had to be digged in, which is what they did in the 50s. If a hoax worked once, they will repeat it.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy