What's not true? "Molly" is meth analogues?

My understanding was sassafras was the only precursor. I'm not a chemist, though.

I doubt in your examples of "cut" "molly". I fully expect anything being called "molly" to be entirely meth unless it came straight from a legitimate lab.

Nobody needs a molly "fix" where they're microdosing to keep from getting sick and putting up with baking soda. It's a bunch of crunchy hippity dippity college kids looking for a thrill.

So people sell them meth at a gigantic markup.

you heard me. rich people buy in bulk, get crazy discounts, and resell to remake the money. poor people pay premium on single doses.

That's the same with everything though. Stupid people can't do math.

A guy told me he charged a premium for people who always wanted to "pay next time", and straight up told them about it because he was fucking sick of it. Guess what, they'll still pay more being fucking deadbeats instead of just having the money right then.

It's like the lottery being a tax against stupid people.

one would have to be in the correct market

And for actual MDMA, that's communist china or labs who get it from CCP. Very rare, and very expensive.

That's my laymen understanding as an (somewhat) average cannabis user, though.