Fooled me once. NY Post gets CAUGHT posting a fake dying in the streets photo.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Fck all the sons of bitches doing this psyop.
It's a suggestion offered on a screen...when will those who consent to look at it ever reflect upon the consequences of their action? Could that ignorance of reality in favor of suggested fiction be the inspiration for those who exploit ignorance?
Sure, we're guilty of looking at the news they print. But the people who buy up every news outlet to make sure we have only one narrative available to us need to be held accountable for their crimes, which are worse than the crimes of people who search dozens of news outlets to see all sides but end up only getting the narrative they're fed.
The ignorance of the many creates the weakness the few ruthlessly exploit. It's a parasitic relationship and we started it.
Take money for example...the highest value within all existence is ones ability to evaluate all by free will of choice. Money was a suggestion by other ones who tricked us to ignore choice of evaluation for substitute value defined by the free will of others; who promptly used usury to hasten the process of devaluing us; to the point of them gate-keeping access to reality behind a paywall of compliance to then...yet the majority of us still beliefs in the value of money; while also ignoring that no other life-form uses money; that the majority of us lives under world wide poverty; and that the riches of the rich don't actually use money, because they already claim ownership over everything they tricked us to believe costs money.
Ignorance started this; Ignorance maintains it; and ignorance inspires the few to ruthlessly exploit the many. This isn't us vs them; it's each ones ignorance and the collective consequences thereof.
The news feeds those who want to believe and those who don't want to believe. Both ignore reality while consenting to suggested fiction. The suggestion of "abortion" for example led to over half a century of conflict of reason (truth versus false) between pro-life vs pro-choice (both sides branded by the same few who offered abortion). And to this day you will hardly find anyone pointing out that life vs choice deliberately contradicts that life equals (free will of) choice.
All of this originates in ones choice to ignore reality for fiction, and that's the only issue we need to collectively talk about; while individually comprehend and act upon.
No other lifeform uses electricity either. I’m not going back to living in a cave. You can’t make me.
Wuhan dying in the streets fooled at the start. Even with skepticism.
To do the same trick again?
The shame is on those still fooled, now.
The "ignorant" are complicit in the crime.
News (north; east; south; west coverage) offered on the screen; one consents to by looking at it. Within reality it doesn't matter what's on the screen; only that one ignores reality for the screen (fiction).
Same trick...suggestion in exchange for consent by free will of choice to ignorance of reality. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave%2C_from_Plato%E2%80%99s_Republic.jpg
An -ism aka a belief offered by others in exchange for consent by free will of choice to ignore reality (motion) for fiction (affixed beliefs). Meanwhile; SCEP'TIC, noun (Gr. from to look about, to consider, to speculate). That refers to adaptation to inspiration within motion; instead of holding onto affixed beliefs.
A reality based on motion is ongoing; which is why those who ignore it are falling for the same trick over and over again. They don't comprehend motion; because they choose to ignore it.
Shame represents shirking responsibility over self by blaming others. Nature doesn't shame; it uses the consequences of actions to inspire self sustenance.
Ignorance represents choice of action within ALL. It's not a crime; it's one side of the function of self sustenance; the otehr being adherence. We cannot judge others for crimes; we need to adhere to natural law to sustain ourselves; which would prevent such "crimes" of ignorance; based on lack of acting upon ignorance.
We are within the balance (momentum) of motion; in-between adherence (need) and ignorance (want). It's not about a need or want; but about the balance act of self sustenance in-between.
"shame represents shirking responsibility over self by blaming others"
Well written but i disagree.
Shame can also represent knowing one has fckd up and feeling bad about it. Embarrassed. Etc.