CREATE, verb transitive [Latin] - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist"...believing in the one creator of everything equals believing in nothing. Creation represents the inversion of transmutation aka ONE transmuting out of ALL.
To convert or change something into something else is not the inverse or opposite of creating something out of nothing, the opposite would be closest to destroy, to create nothing from something (turn something into nothing)
I like your comments and the way you think, but your messages do often confuse me, or your word choices leave it hard for me to wrap my head around, when I know you are trying to be as clear and concise as you can, trying to put into words a perspective that is so wooley and infirm, and I guess this is the first obvious issue I can formulate into words to reply to you, to interrogate, to hopefully get a better understanding, whether it's a mistake on your part, or a lack of understanding or perspective on mine.
To convert or change something into something else is not the inverse or opposite of creating something out of nothing
It is the act of consenting to believe in "nothing" that represents the inversion of reality (beleif equals fiction aka ignorance of reality). It's not the action of creating out of nothing that is in question here; but the implied consent to believe in nothing, which is what creates the conflict of reason (truth versus false).
the opposite would be closest to destroy, to create nothing from something (turn something into nothing)
a) to destroy equals to transmute back to base (magnetic form to electric flow aka potential back to potentiality).
b) NOTH'ING, noun [no and thing.] - "not any thing; not any being or existence; a word that denies the existence of any thing; non-entity; opposed to something. The world was created from nothing".
We are within ALL; within energy in motion; potential within potentiality; momentum within motion; individuals within a collective; magnetic within electric; sustenance within flow; ONE within ALL that was; is and could be. Nothing represents ONEs free will of choice to ignore ALL for the offer of another ONE; which ONE consents to by believing it; which represents ONEs self restriction of comprehending ALL perceived information.
I like your comments and the way you think, but your messages do often confuse me, or your word choices leave it hard for me to wrap my head around, when I know you are trying to be as clear and concise as you can, trying to put into words a perspective that is so wooley and infirm, and I guess this is the first obvious issue I can formulate into words to reply to you, to interrogate, to hopefully get a better understanding, whether it's a mistake on your part, or a lack of understanding or perspective on mine.
Ask yourself where you got "nothing" from? How did you perceive "nothing" when the reality around you represents everything? Did you consent to believe another ONE about what "nothing" is? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BvFszgQ-CA
If "nothing" is too confusing for you; try 0 (zero)...is there an "off" state to reality or are we deceived to ignore the always "on" state (of energy in motion)? Click your lights off and ask yourself; where is the energy? Is it off?
your word choices leave it hard for me to wrap my head around
"coronavirus"...one marketing push and the entire world believes themselves to be in the position to reason about if it's true or false. Shortly after they switched the marketing to "covid-19" and since the majority already consented to the first offer; the switch isn't even questioned anymore.
When you are trying to wrap your head around an offer; then that represents you trying to adapt to inspiration by free will of choice; which represents adaptation to motion aka struggle, while the "covid" crowd believed information, while ignoring free will through it. To believe another gives them the authority over the offered belief; while consenting to believe represents ignoring the sole authority over self (free will).
If one believes another one; one doesn't make choices for oneself within all anymore. Ask your self why me using ONE and ALL is being perceived as questionable choices of words; as retarded; as deceiving; as philosophical; as drug induced babble; as confused; as egocentric; as heretical and so on?
Words represents fiction within a reality based on motion; and so those who use them act in ignorance of reality by free will of choice. Stripping languages down to ONE and ALL prevents the ignorance of others to hide behind the complexity of languages, and questioning belief and reason; strips them of their tools of division...tools they do not allow themselves to even question; because it would show them the selfishness behind their choice of ignorance.
That's what each of us is up against...selfishness within self, while all the perceived conflicts (fiction) with others are the consequence of that ignorance of reality.
CREATE, verb transitive [Latin] - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist"...believing in the one creator of everything equals believing in nothing. Creation represents the inversion of transmutation aka ONE transmuting out of ALL.
To convert or change something into something else is not the inverse or opposite of creating something out of nothing, the opposite would be closest to destroy, to create nothing from something (turn something into nothing)
I like your comments and the way you think, but your messages do often confuse me, or your word choices leave it hard for me to wrap my head around, when I know you are trying to be as clear and concise as you can, trying to put into words a perspective that is so wooley and infirm, and I guess this is the first obvious issue I can formulate into words to reply to you, to interrogate, to hopefully get a better understanding, whether it's a mistake on your part, or a lack of understanding or perspective on mine.
It is the act of consenting to believe in "nothing" that represents the inversion of reality (beleif equals fiction aka ignorance of reality). It's not the action of creating out of nothing that is in question here; but the implied consent to believe in nothing, which is what creates the conflict of reason (truth versus false).
a) to destroy equals to transmute back to base (magnetic form to electric flow aka potential back to potentiality).
b) NOTH'ING, noun [no and thing.] - "not any thing; not any being or existence; a word that denies the existence of any thing; non-entity; opposed to something. The world was created from nothing".
We are within ALL; within energy in motion; potential within potentiality; momentum within motion; individuals within a collective; magnetic within electric; sustenance within flow; ONE within ALL that was; is and could be. Nothing represents ONEs free will of choice to ignore ALL for the offer of another ONE; which ONE consents to by believing it; which represents ONEs self restriction of comprehending ALL perceived information.
Ask yourself where you got "nothing" from? How did you perceive "nothing" when the reality around you represents everything? Did you consent to believe another ONE about what "nothing" is? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BvFszgQ-CA
If "nothing" is too confusing for you; try 0 (zero)...is there an "off" state to reality or are we deceived to ignore the always "on" state (of energy in motion)? Click your lights off and ask yourself; where is the energy? Is it off?
"coronavirus"...one marketing push and the entire world believes themselves to be in the position to reason about if it's true or false. Shortly after they switched the marketing to "covid-19" and since the majority already consented to the first offer; the switch isn't even questioned anymore.
When you are trying to wrap your head around an offer; then that represents you trying to adapt to inspiration by free will of choice; which represents adaptation to motion aka struggle, while the "covid" crowd believed information, while ignoring free will through it. To believe another gives them the authority over the offered belief; while consenting to believe represents ignoring the sole authority over self (free will).
If one believes another one; one doesn't make choices for oneself within all anymore. Ask your self why me using ONE and ALL is being perceived as questionable choices of words; as retarded; as deceiving; as philosophical; as drug induced babble; as confused; as egocentric; as heretical and so on?
Words represents fiction within a reality based on motion; and so those who use them act in ignorance of reality by free will of choice. Stripping languages down to ONE and ALL prevents the ignorance of others to hide behind the complexity of languages, and questioning belief and reason; strips them of their tools of division...tools they do not allow themselves to even question; because it would show them the selfishness behind their choice of ignorance.
That's what each of us is up against...selfishness within self, while all the perceived conflicts (fiction) with others are the consequence of that ignorance of reality.