No one, anywhere, has said anything about your strawman in the title. The reductio ad absurdum you employ serves only to intentionally misrepresent and diminish the argument of people with scientifically valid concerns about a “treatment” with zero legal accountability for anything it does to anyone. It also flies in the face of what we know about the reactions of previous untested “vaccinations.” It’s either Poe’s Law of a leftist “retort” to vaccine skepticism or a genuine statement you’re making solely to libel said people.