Conspiracy on conspiracy.win - Conspiracies - Conspiracy Theories & Facts

Conspiracy on conspiracy.win

posted 3 years ago by FortheGenerations 3 years ago by FortheGenerations +13 / -10

Flat earth gets downvoted like no other. This is literally the mother of all conspiracies. Mix of Deepstate troll farms and heavily indoctrinated Normies who can't see through the lies. That is all.

124 comments

124 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (124)

sorted by:

▲ -5 ▼

– TallestSkil -5 points 3 years ago +2 / -7

Why can everyone south of the equator see the exact same stars rotating in the same direction around the same fixed central point in the sky due south of them if they’re supposedly all looking in different directions?
Why are the distances between degrees of latitude uniform and don’t grow exponentially away from the equator?
Why does everyone on Earth get the same result for the Eratosthenes experiment, when people nearer the equator should get a much smaller circumference for the Earth than those nearer the poles?
Come to think of it, was Eratosthenes part of the “round Earth” conspiracy?
Surviving records show that the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians based their astronomical forecasts on calculations assuming the Earth is a globe. Did this conspiracy begin at the dawn of civilization, or are all ancient artifacts nothing but Victorian forgeries? If so, why has this never been detected by modern carbon-dating techniques?
Why do arc lengths of given angles of longitude decrease rather than increase south of the equator?
Why does the sun not rise in the northeast and set in the northwest, year round, for everyone on Earth?
Why DOES the sun set, when the law of perspective states that the angular size of the sun’s altitude, like everything else, can’t become negative?
Why does the sun’s angular size not change throughout the day or year, since it is “moving toward and away from us” and is “closer than we’re told”?
Seriously, did you fall asleep during geometry class, or are you just completely demented?
If you believe in zeteticism, why do you keep relying on magical and unprovable solutions, which can’t be shown to exist with your own eyes and clearly don’t exist at all? Apparently, zeteticism is just code for “make any old bullshit up and pretend it’s true.”
If all photographs of a round Earth are a hoax, why not simply create photographs of a flat Earth?
A property of mass is that it has gravitational force regardless of size. If the Earth did not have a gravitational field, wouldn’t that imply that the Earth doesn’t physically exist?
Where is the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station located if the south “pole” is the whole circumference of the Earth?
Wouldn’t creating such elaborate fakes and conspiracies cost an equal–if not greater–amount of money than the science they are supposedly covering up?
The idea of the Earth as a sphere has existed at least since the time of the ancient Greeks, long before NASA. What were their financial motives?
What financial motives could NASA have, since their budget is still cut every year?
How could the sun be a spotlight if it is a sphere? On the flat Earth, the light projection would have to be a semicircle.
Why does the North Star goes to the horizon?
Why do constellations appear to be different in the Southern and Northern hemispheres?
Why is the Coriolis effect stronger near both poles, instead of stronger in the north and weaker in the south?
If the circumferential south pole is preventing the oceans from pouring over the edge of the flat Earth, why didn’t the oceans disappear during the incredible amount of time it would have taken for that ice to form?
If the oceans would–if they could–pour off the edge of the flat Earth, where, then, would they go? Does this mean that whatever keeps the oceans on the surface of the flat Earth only operates in a downward direction on the uppermost surface and is absent on the underneath?
Why are satellites visible from Earth with a pair of binoculars and even the naked eye?
How could a flat body maintain an atmosphere?
Why are other celestial bodies spheres but the Earth is not? How, and why, was the Earth created differently?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– FortheGenerations [S] 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Skimming over can't answer all questions driving. Ice wall keeps it all in the water. How can an atmosphere exist besides a vacuum of space without a solid barrier, it can't. Satellite's question there is so much proof of the impossibility of this I suggest you watch one of my previous posts of international flat earth conference about the impossibility of light from the sun and moon he discusses the ISS, go learn. NASA, always over budget and behind schedule despite any cuts. 300+ billion per year hardly a cut. Coriolis effect not taken into account for military sniping or artillery despite the claims, and toilets flow both ways despite the claims go test this yourself in your sink it is a farce. Old claims it were a sphere from back in the day were not necessarily of bad faith, just theories, there were also sun worshippers way back in the day that could of wanted to create a mathematical model to support the sun as being the center. Other "Planets" are not like earth they are self illuminating luminaries with no Land there, and there is no proof they are actually spheres either. They do not receive sunlight from our sun, it is impossible based on how bright they appear, also in that video linked. I'll try to get back to your other questions

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -5 ▼

– TallestSkil -5 points 3 years ago +2 / -7

Skimming over can't answer all questions driving.

My sense of morality begrudgingly tells you not to endanger yourself. I don’t expect a quick answer; I just want a real one.

Ice wall keeps it all in the water.

Covered that; how’d they prevent all water from disappearing before they formed?

How can an atmosphere exist besides a vacuum of space without a solid barrier

Gravity.

Satellite's question there is so much proof of the impossibility of this

Or you could look up at sunset.

go learn

Just answer.

NASA, always over budget and behind schedule despite any cuts.

Maybe they should stop cutting the budget and changing the plan every four years, then.

Coriolis effect not taken into account for military sniping or artillery despite the claims

It is, though.

and toilets flow both ways despite the claims go test this yourself in your sink

Did; flowed one way.

Old claims it were a sphere from back in the day were not necessarily of bad faith, just theories

And were proven true.

Other "Planets" are not like earth they are self illuminating luminaries

Why.

and there is no proof they are actually spheres either.

Their physical motion proves it.

They do not receive sunlight from our sun

Which explains why they have phases… right?

it is impossible based on how bright they appear

Learn literally anything about the inverse square law.

I'll try to get back to your other questions

Again, don’t rush.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– FortheGenerations [S] 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

You should actually learn the inverse square law and you'll see what I'm saying about the impossibility of the brightness of the self luminous planets that don't receive sunlight. Go learn and apply it correctly. Will get back to you though on the rest of your points just wanted to state that real quick.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -4 ▼

– TallestSkil -4 points 3 years ago +1 / -5

Go learn and apply it correctly.

It doesn’t work when your “sun” is only a couple miles across. It does when it’s ~950,000 miles across, though.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?