Bombshell testimonial reveals that George Floyd did not die of drug overdose
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Yawn what a load of bullshit. You discount the alcohol level and just let them drive officer. Individual intake varies despite their alcohol level and their erratic behaviour. Just let them drive. Get rid of the breathalyser. Alcohol levels are redundant. Drunks have a resistance. Let them drive.
Somebody get a new bombshell in. Laugh that idiot out of the court.
Tell me more about how you know more than a forensic medical expert, please.
You also obviously have reviewed all the evidence that was presented at court and which formed the basis for the testimony. How do you even have access to it?
Oh look it's the household nigger on another multiple account. Fuck off nigger.
It should stand to reason there is no argument in claiming resistance. When by law there is toxicology levels. These are potentially fatal on dosage. Not resistance. Hence there is the breathalyser. Also drugs tests. You can't drive when under the influence. What killed the drunk in a car crash. Being drunk did. Dumbass.
That fucking idiot so professional in that courtroom has no argument when he is on the sauce. It is his argument. But immunity. Hick.
What symptoms has Floyd showed that are common when dying of a drug overdose?
Please enlighten us.