I have known about stuff like WTC7 for quite some time but only began digging into deeper conspiracies in the past couple months following a Kundalini awakening.
A few weeks ago, I learned that the moon landing was fake. And it's hilariously blatantly fake. That was a big pill to swallow. Then I learned about NASA, space agencies, Mars missions, ISS footage, the whole charade...
Then I saw someone spamming flat earth stuff on here. Initially I rolled my eyes and assumed it was a psyop to distract from real conspiracies. Then I thought - isn't it strange how the only conspiracy theory mocked more than the fake moon landing is flat earth. So I looked into it.
Lo and behold, after going over the arguments and counterarguments, I'm sitting here in a state of disbelief. This has got to be the best-kept secret out there.
If you're interested, this video covers most of the core topics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_bJYXS9p4A
This website is fantastic as well - http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/
Two thoughts are running through my mind in particular:
-
I'm going to have to go through my entire life knowing that the earth is flat while literally everyone else mistakenly thinks it's a sphere, even people who research conspiracies. If I mention this at all, I will be labeled as a lunatic by everyone within earshot
-
With lies this big, imagine how much disdain the perpetrators of these lies have for the normies. LOL
To be clear, it's not as simple as just saying "the earth is flat" (like at all), but there's really no point in me attempting to prove anything further, as the resources linked above (I think they're made by the same guy) do a much better job than I ever could. I also think it helps to have a foundation of esoteric knowledge so that you can grasp the implications of what a flat earth would mean. Not trying to be preachy - just saying I would have no idea regarding how a flat earth fits into the bigger picture without that type of knowledge. The video and website are great in regards to science/history though.
Overall just wanted to make this post and share. Also BIG shoutout the guy who was spamming flat earth stuff - you broke through my ingrained resistance to the idea. In particular you posted a link to an interview in the comment section of one of your posts and it got me started.
I think I can take a break from conspiracies for a while after this one.
Still waiting for you to explain you model but we both know that you will never do it because actually explaining something would immediately expose your bullshit for what it is.
I still find it amusing that of all the places in the internet you chose this one.
Explain what model?
How does the Earth really look like, what does the space around Earth look like, how did it form, what are planets, how large are they, how far away, what are the moon and the sun, how large are they, how far away, what are stars, how large are they ,how far away etc etc.
If you do not believe in the Heliocentric model of the solar system, describe the alternative.
In your own words or by quoting other people but not by just spamming youtube videos.
You can't and you won't.
The alternative is fairly well defended in that video.
There is a lot to go over. And more that the video didn't discuss the more I look into it. It is really interesting.
We are on a disk like plane Like a snow globe.
North as we current know it is at the center of this plane rather the "top" of the globe.
South approaches as you near the perimeter of the disk and Antarctica encircles and forms the edges of the disk ?. Rather than just being a little blob on the bottom.
The sun and moon float above the disk simply because they are actually less dense than air.
They make a spiraling motion around the disk and so do the planets. The sun spirals inward to the center and then out again.
A compelling argument is made about the stars spinning around us in a circle because if we were being thrown through the universe at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour for the last billions of years our perspective relative to the constellations would end up hanging. But they havent. It is clear that we do not move relative to static constellations.
There is also a compelling argument made that the north pole should be just frigid and inhabitable as Antarctica if they are both at the same relative latitude from the equator in the heliocentric model but for some reason the north pole is is relatively "green" compared to Antarctica. And you could say it's because of the "tilt" of earth's axis but then that breaks the way earth's weather patterns work around the equator in the heliocentric model which actually perfectly in a band when looking at it from the flat model.
All right, thank you. That is a start.
Let us then continue with the sun and the moon.
How large are they, how far are they away, what are they made of, how do they float, how do sunsets and sunrises work in your model?
Look at the curvature formula carefully.
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=20&h0=5.5&unit=imperial
And note the UN flag.
Am I writing fucking Chinese?
I've explained the shit probably 500 times. How did it form, God created it. What are planets, self luminating objects just like the stars that DO NOT receive any light from our sun (it is impossible), they are not nearly as far away as you think. What does space around earth look like, it is water above. The moon and sun are both electric/magnetic in a sense, they are mass-less, and they are not very big within the dome. None of the planets are objects with mass, they are only luminaries (lights) caused by either electricity, magnetism, or vibration of air bubbles above the Firmament. Didn't spend a ton of time on the response because I suspect you're just shilling but there you go short version.
If your explanation is "magic" then any discussion with you is pointless because you can explain away any flaw in your model with "more magic".