I was so upset at first that trump set us up on the 6th Jan to get our guns. But now I'm questioning if it's a good thing, once the forced vaccine start. I don't want to many people around my with guns, once the taxing normal people out of cars, plains and then food, I don't want to many people to have guns then. Did trump do this to help us in the dark winter coming.?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (178)
sorted by:
Consent by free will to believe anything offered; creates a conflict of reason (truth versus false), which represents all sides of every conflict; controlled by those who made the offer.
TallestSkil has picked a side. Pretty sure it's the side of Satan, hence the innumerable lies.
Nature doesn't lie; it doesn't offer corrupt information; it offers predefined inspiration to our senses, which when consented to by free will of choice creates comprehended information within ourselves.
Those who choose to ignore adherence to nature; to the source of ALL information (reality), they will instead "believe" the offers of other ONEs within ALL. This is why every belief requires consent by free will of choice to the offer of others. The act of believing (not what one believes) represents ONEs ignorance of ALL reality; which is what makes what ONE believes into fiction.
Belief in the fiction of truth creates the fiction of lies, which creates the conflict of reason (truth vs false) ...a fictitious conflict defined by a ONEs chocie to consent to believe another ONE.
"in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti"...who is it that speaks "in the name of" (in nomine) the father; the son, and the holy ghost? It is your consent to believe those who make the offer, that afterwards gain the authority to act in the name of everything you choose to believe in. They are the ONEs who define the good side to unquestionable (deities) and the bad side to blamed (Satan).
In the middle of unquestionable authority and boogeymen to blame, sits who? ONEself; the ignorant who shirks responsibility over self onto the false authority, while justifying it by casting blame on the offered boogeyman.
This represents control over ignorance through suggestion.
I can’t tell if you’re on several different types of psychotropics at once or if you’re just a GPT-3 Markov bot that doesn’t have a handle on its content yet.
If I could understand what you’re saying, I’d say that you’re pretty damn close to what I’m saying, though.
Look, it's the fake Christian again!
What restricts comprehension of what nature offers your perception? The beliefs you consent to; which are all offered to you by others. If you believe (anything; doesn't matter what) then you perceive reality through the lens of those beliefs (fiction).
Yes, but you're stuck at the so called jews, which prevents you from questioning what those few, who call themselves jews (among endless other brands) are exploiting to control the many. talmudic reasoning maintains the conflicts of reason (based on believing in truth versus false) aka both sides of every conflict in this world, by suggesting (offering) both sides contradictions to what they're reasoning about.
Reason (truth versus) false represents fiction based on the act of believing. That's not how nature works. Meanwhile the talmud teaches to not use reason, but implication instead (if/then), which is in adherence to motion (nature aka reality).
Implication represents adaptation to motion; belief represents stagnation of comprehension.
I still can’t tell. It’s all very interesting, though.
You don't find it interesting in the slightest, fake Christian.