VIC'TIM noun [Latin victima.] - "something destroyed; something sacrificed in the pursuit of an object". "in the pursuit of" aka ONEs wants".
BLAME, verb transitive - "to censure (finding fault)". There's no fault in ALL. ONEs choice of action (in adherence or ignorance of ALL) is what creates the consequences for the ONEs within the ALL. Who's to blame for ignoring a perfect system? Only ONEself.
It's probably not helpful to victim blame
Would you perceive it the same way; had I wrote "What actions can one write into ones shared bloodline? If no...notice that "you" represents enough of a suggested association to trigger ONE into choosing to ignore coexistence within ALL.
How can it be that I can write three sentences about the ONE within ALL, but the "you" still triggers a defense? Isn't the "you" implied in the ONE within ALL?
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] - "whatever the mind perceives". Ask yourself this...does nature offer information or inspiration to you? Could it be that your senses perceive inspiration, and that your choice about how to act upon it, is what creates comprehended information within yourself? Could inspiration to information be a transmutation based on ONEs choices within ALL?
Now what if others are offering you information to trick you to ignore inspiration? How woudl the offered information from another reach you? Could it be that you choosing to "believe" their offered information represents you consenting to another ONE, while ignoring ALL?
your posts don't provide any information
See, you "want" information, but you "need" inspiration. The differences is that you are tricked to seek information that you can believe, while nature defines inspiration by your "need" to adapt to it. Tell me something that nature offers you, which you need to believe?
or room for discussion
When you consent to believe; you consent to the conflict of reason (truth versus false), but reality operates not on reason, but on implication (if/then). Try that before consenting to reason.
'm guessing you are trying to tell people that all = one.
I can't, because the comprehension of that represents ONEs self discernment. a) I adapt to whatever inspires me to build my own comprehension, and b) I boil all the fictitious offers down to the lowest common denominator to prevent an escape route for the ignorance of others (escape into belief and reason).
Before ALL within ONE of energy, comes comprehension of being ONE within ALL of motion, and that's crucial for self discernment, because motion defines the rules for all those within motion. This isn't offered information for you to believe; these are attempts to prevent you to choose to ignore the inspiration needed to allow yourself to question motion.
Only you have the free will of choice to do that, and you would quickly learn that your beliefs won't let you. That's you self restricting your comprehension by choice. The parasites use endless suggestion to keep you in that state of ignorance, which is why I need to get more efficient at generating inspiration.
That is nice that you have found a platform for free speech, I'm happy for you.
I'm all over the web; including in different languages. It's just adaptation to inspiration.
VIC'TIM noun [Latin victima.] - "something destroyed; something sacrificed in the pursuit of an object". "in the pursuit of" aka ONEs wants".
BLAME, verb transitive - "to censure (finding fault)". There's no fault in ALL. ONEs choice of action (in adherence or ignorance of ALL) is what creates the consequences for the ONEs within the ALL. Who's to blame for ignoring a perfect system? Only ONEself.
Would you perceive it the same way; had I wrote "What actions can one write into ones shared bloodline? If no...notice that "you" represents enough of a suggested association to trigger ONE into choosing to ignore coexistence within ALL.
How can it be that I can write three sentences about the ONE within ALL, but the "you" still triggers a defense? Isn't the "you" implied in the ONE within ALL?
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] - "whatever the mind perceives". Ask yourself this...does nature offer information or inspiration to you? Could it be that your senses perceive inspiration, and that your choice about how to act upon it, is what creates comprehended information within yourself? Could inspiration to information be a transmutation based on ONEs choices within ALL?
Now what if others are offering you information to trick you to ignore inspiration? How woudl the offered information from another reach you? Could it be that you choosing to "believe" their offered information represents you consenting to another ONE, while ignoring ALL?
See, you "want" information, but you "need" inspiration. The differences is that you are tricked to seek information that you can believe, while nature defines inspiration by your "need" to adapt to it. Tell me something that nature offers you, which you need to believe?
When you consent to believe; you consent to the conflict of reason (truth versus false), but reality operates not on reason, but on implication (if/then). Try that before consenting to reason.
I can't, because the comprehension of that represents ONEs self discernment. a) I adapt to whatever inspires me to build my own comprehension, and b) I boil all the fictitious offers down to the lowest common denominator to prevent an escape route for the ignorance of others (escape into belief and reason).
Before ALL within ONE of energy, comes comprehension of being ONE within ALL of motion, and that's crucial for self discernment, because motion defines the rules for all those within motion. This isn't offered information for you to believe; these are attempts to prevent you to choose to ignore the inspiration needed to allow yourself to question motion.
Only you have the free will of choice to do that, and you would quickly learn that your beliefs won't let you. That's you self restricting your comprehension by choice. The parasites use endless suggestion to keep you in that state of ignorance, which is why I need to get more efficient at generating inspiration.
I'm all over the web; including in different languages. It's just adaptation to inspiration.