Within the motion of inception to death, what does self sustenance represent? What is it that ONE can sustain from a life that's always running out, and unavoidable death? That which remains within ALL...the blood; the "shared" identity of self within the bloodline; the residue between loss (motion; electric velocity) and recharge (momentum; magnetic friction) aka that which is needed to sustain the heat, that velocity meets friction generate aka the cooling fluid.
Also, while they trick us to consent to his-story; we ignore our story, within the bloodline aka the accumulation of that which was; within us aka that which is; with the free will of choice over action about what will be.
Edit: ALL equals motion; blood equals the motion within ONE.
Imo, you'd get more traction and engagement if you weren't so vague about your theories, and using words and terms in such odd ways. If this style is just a 'filter' you're using, then nm.
Adaptation by free will of choice represents a "filter" for perceived reality within motion. I make the choice to adapt to whatever inspires me; hence I "filter" input; process it to build my comprehension (potential), and then act upon it for the output.
Just means "orderly" representing the connotation of the natural order; defined by motion onto all the ONEs within ALL motion.
if you weren't so vague about your theories
THE'ORY, noun [Latin theoria; to see or contemplate.]. That refers to ONEs assumptions made about ALL perceived information offered. How does ONE make assumptions? Choice of action over perceived inspiration, which then builds ONEs "comprehension".
It is that comprehension within ONE that creates the "vagueness". Another ONE (me) cannot change ONEs (you) "vague" comprehension; only ONEself can by adhering to ALL through adaptation to inspiration offered.
From a different angle...we are being told to accumulate "knowledge", which they tell us we get by consenting to other authority offering it to us (teacher to student) aka a chain of command to supply "knowledge".
Now free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self, so why do I then need to consent to the authority of others to sustain myself? So let's add the ignored "self" back into the mix...to learn (for self) equals to teach (self), and to teach (self) equals to learn (for self). So teach/learn represents the same action for ONE within ALL.
Nature (ALL aka energy in motion) is a) the source of ALL information and b) does NOT offer information in form of words; brands; idols; instead it offers information through motion as inspiration to our senses. What ONE perceives represents the consequences of actions set into motion, which inspires us to adapt to it. If we choose by free will to adhere instead of ignore that offer of inspiration we build our comprehension (potential). In other words...consent to adherence to ALL uses alchemy to transmute offered inspiration by ALL into information comprehended within ONE.
The source of ALL information is within ONE; channeled by ONEs free will of choice through ONE actions as an ecosystem spreading (emitting) outwards (aka the consequences of ONEs actions).
Tell me...am I vague or could it be your lack of comprehension? You operate within reason (conflict between truth versus false), which is how you estimate the "information" you believe I offer to you. Such a conflict (truth versus false) does not exist within the reality of motion, which operates on implication (if/then) aka consequences of actions set into motion. You consent by free will to uphold reason within your mind; it's why you have an ego; an inner monologue, formed by belief based definitions of reality (ALL) through words.
You think in language; which means you uphold information within motion, while ignoring that motion communicates through inspiration. How can you get inspired by motion if you hold onto affixed beliefs? You are tricked through suggestion of beliefs to self restrict your own comprehension of reality (ALL).
How can I communicate such a thing to you, when you hold the sole authority over your actions (free will) that allow you to keep ignoring it? Especially when I'm restricted to using "words; brands; idols" to describe this fundamental self corruption, while being inconvenienced by a parasite, exploiting all of humanity through it?
It's not that I deliberately use "odd words" to keep what I'm saying "vague"...I'm surrounded by ignorance, and it blocks inspiration by those who choose to block it. Believing me doesn't help any ONE, it would just give me false authority, which tempts me with imbalances of power over others.
Try need over want; inspiration over information; and implication (if/then) over reason (truth versus false) and do whatever it takes to allow yourself to question if we are within motion (not time, but the ever changing moment demanding adaptation).
you'd get more traction and engagement
For me that would be adherence to a "want" while ignoring the "need" to adapt to inspiration to sustain self. I do this to sustain self, which increases my potential, which attracts unity with others. The shortcut (temptation) to want to help others, while ignoring self (humanitarianism) just creates short term benefits, while ignoring long term consequences of corruption through ignorance of self. Been there; done that; fuck this.
Within the motion of inception to death, what does self sustenance represent? What is it that ONE can sustain from a life that's always running out, and unavoidable death? That which remains within ALL...the blood; the "shared" identity of self within the bloodline; the residue between loss (motion; electric velocity) and recharge (momentum; magnetic friction) aka that which is needed to sustain the heat, that velocity meets friction generate aka the cooling fluid.
Also, while they trick us to consent to his-story; we ignore our story, within the bloodline aka the accumulation of that which was; within us aka that which is; with the free will of choice over action about what will be.
Edit: ALL equals motion; blood equals the motion within ONE.
Imo, you'd get more traction and engagement if you weren't so vague about your theories, and using words and terms in such odd ways. If this style is just a 'filter' you're using, then nm.
Adaptation by free will of choice represents a "filter" for perceived reality within motion. I make the choice to adapt to whatever inspires me; hence I "filter" input; process it to build my comprehension (potential), and then act upon it for the output.
Just means "orderly" representing the connotation of the natural order; defined by motion onto all the ONEs within ALL motion.
THE'ORY, noun [Latin theoria; to see or contemplate.]. That refers to ONEs assumptions made about ALL perceived information offered. How does ONE make assumptions? Choice of action over perceived inspiration, which then builds ONEs "comprehension".
It is that comprehension within ONE that creates the "vagueness". Another ONE (me) cannot change ONEs (you) "vague" comprehension; only ONEself can by adhering to ALL through adaptation to inspiration offered.
From a different angle...we are being told to accumulate "knowledge", which they tell us we get by consenting to other authority offering it to us (teacher to student) aka a chain of command to supply "knowledge".
Now free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self, so why do I then need to consent to the authority of others to sustain myself? So let's add the ignored "self" back into the mix...to learn (for self) equals to teach (self), and to teach (self) equals to learn (for self). So teach/learn represents the same action for ONE within ALL.
Nature (ALL aka energy in motion) is a) the source of ALL information and b) does NOT offer information in form of words; brands; idols; instead it offers information through motion as inspiration to our senses. What ONE perceives represents the consequences of actions set into motion, which inspires us to adapt to it. If we choose by free will to adhere instead of ignore that offer of inspiration we build our comprehension (potential). In other words...consent to adherence to ALL uses alchemy to transmute offered inspiration by ALL into information comprehended within ONE.
The source of ALL information is within ONE; channeled by ONEs free will of choice through ONE actions as an ecosystem spreading (emitting) outwards (aka the consequences of ONEs actions).
Tell me...am I vague or could it be your lack of comprehension? You operate within reason (conflict between truth versus false), which is how you estimate the "information" you believe I offer to you. Such a conflict (truth versus false) does not exist within the reality of motion, which operates on implication (if/then) aka consequences of actions set into motion. You consent by free will to uphold reason within your mind; it's why you have an ego; an inner monologue, formed by belief based definitions of reality (ALL) through words.
You think in language; which means you uphold information within motion, while ignoring that motion communicates through inspiration. How can you get inspired by motion if you hold onto affixed beliefs? You are tricked through suggestion of beliefs to self restrict your own comprehension of reality (ALL).
How can I communicate such a thing to you, when you hold the sole authority over your actions (free will) that allow you to keep ignoring it? Especially when I'm restricted to using "words; brands; idols" to describe this fundamental self corruption, while being inconvenienced by a parasite, exploiting all of humanity through it?
It's not that I deliberately use "odd words" to keep what I'm saying "vague"...I'm surrounded by ignorance, and it blocks inspiration by those who choose to block it. Believing me doesn't help any ONE, it would just give me false authority, which tempts me with imbalances of power over others.
Try need over want; inspiration over information; and implication (if/then) over reason (truth versus false) and do whatever it takes to allow yourself to question if we are within motion (not time, but the ever changing moment demanding adaptation).
For me that would be adherence to a "want" while ignoring the "need" to adapt to inspiration to sustain self. I do this to sustain self, which increases my potential, which attracts unity with others. The shortcut (temptation) to want to help others, while ignoring self (humanitarianism) just creates short term benefits, while ignoring long term consequences of corruption through ignorance of self. Been there; done that; fuck this.