Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

0
Trump Inaugural Donor Gets 12 Years Over Illegal Contribution (www.bloomberg.com)
posted 4 years ago by MagaPede69 4 years ago by MagaPede69 +8 / -10
8 comments share
8 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– moic999 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Who is posting this crap?? Here is the link where it is a Biden donor: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/biden-political-donor-sentenced-12-years-prison-illegal-campaign-contributions-straw-donor-scheme/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SpokedB 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

You do realize that people like this donate to both sides so they are always on the winning side? How it's reported is another thing entirely. Left media will talk about how he donated to Trump and Right media will talk about how he donated to Biden.

Trump gave to both sides for years and when he was asked about it:

“It’s smart. It’s called being an intelligent person and a great business person. ... But the truth is that you have to be able to get along with—if you’re gonna be a business person, even in the United States, you wanna get along with all sides because you’re gonna need things from everybody. And you wanna get along with all sides, it’s very important.”

What it comes down to is that he's got 12 years as he should have....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Devils-advocate 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The things to consider though are: This guy admitted he took money from foreign governments to bribe politicians to do what they want. He admitted he tried to gain access to trump by donating to his inauguration. He never claimed to have obtained access to trump or haven had successfully bribed him. -He has never been seen or photographed with trump- He has never been seen in the company off or photographed in the company of trump. He has been seen with obama hillary and biden and there is photographs https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/cover_montage.jpg https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/08/28/elite-fundraiser-for-obama-and-clinton-linked-to-justice-department-probe/

*fixed so stupid people and trolls don't intentionally misinterpret the meaning of what I was saying by taking what I said extremely literally -_-

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SpokedB 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

"He has never been seen or photographed with Trump"

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/02/19/13/39491014-9274593-image-m-3_1613741497563.jpg

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Devils-advocate 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

so he photobombed trump at an event he admitted attempting to bribe trump. I wouldn't classify that as him being with trump. that is like saying you went to some pedowood event and got a picture next to an actor and were claiming you are with them.

Do you see him posing "with trump" shaking his hand? arm around the shoulder? how about just a side by side perpendicular pose where they are together and not a sad desperate attempt to photobomb and bribe an incoming president.

You showed me a picture of trump ignoring a worm while eyes locked with whom he is shaking hands with. Not proof he is with him. Notice how my proof has them shaking hands, arms around each other, or even a side by side embrace. that is what is implied by being seen together. do you understand this?

I'll admit maybe i should have used a different phrase other then with him, because clearly stupid people and trolls will take it quite literally; I believe reasonable people however can clearly see I am referring to literally being in the company of. That is my fuck up and I am entirely sorry. but that doesn't change the fact you are dumb or a troll.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy