Has someone a valid explanation for this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Hahaha CGI
So in 1969, they had cgi good enough to fake the moon landing but not rocket science good enough to send people to the moon?
Kubrick was a master of camera tricks. That's the reason he was supposedly chosen to do the work, because he would stress out over his scenes not being perfect.
https://youtu.be/5ch5WC54egU
2001 wasn't made using cgi.
Try again.
I didn't say it was. I said it was camera tricks and even provided evidence you mouth breathing, "fake news!" crying, insufferable, illiterate little faggot.