…he was a commie degenerate plagiarizer who wanted reparations.

His real name was not Martin Luther King, it was Michael King Jr.; “Luther” was to add (fake) gravitas.

He plagiarized his dissertation: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/11/us/boston-u-panel-finds-plagiarism-by-dr-king.html

Further research, showed he plagiarized throughout his schooling and his career: https://www.amren.com/news/2018/01/martin-luther-king-jr-plagiarism/

He watched as a woman got raped in front of him, laughed, and offered advice: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32989551.pdf#page=18

This rape, occurred when King and compatriots were discussion their orgy habits: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32989551.pdf#page=18

MLK wanted reparations, that is, a direct transfer of wealth: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/06/martin-luther-king-makes-the-case-for-reparations/372696/

And he was a communist: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10125-10133.pdf

So, while COINTELPRO was unconstitutional, and illegal, Hoover had it right about MLK. He only pretended the Civil Rights movement was about equal protection under the law and the end of Jim Crow, the actual endgame was communism and the appropriation of other people’s money to blacks.

His assassination was ironic, in that it happened at the exact moment of his highest popularity, and before his communism and calls for reparations really took off, which would have turned most Americans off to him. Without his assassination, he’d not have the hagiography he does from mainstream press and academia.