Then maybe your submission title could include the fact that this information is from some rando on twitter, rather than presenting it here as truth? That would certainly be more forthcoming.
It does not at all editorialize a title to clarify that the claim is being made by someone who has no established connection to the truth.
"Your skepticism is your own responsibility" is a huge part of what's wrong with how people consume information these days, because they are fed garbage with the truth buried in the comments and they don't bother to question it.
The purpose of a conspiracy forum is to find the truth, and you are deliberately obscuring it. You can do better.
Look, i don't know if this is true, since no source is given. It says "today at 8pm" which could mean yesterday... who the fuck knows/
Don't ask me for sauce. you're too fat anyways. Get some excercise.
Then maybe your submission title could include the fact that this information is from some rando on twitter, rather than presenting it here as truth? That would certainly be more forthcoming.
Dude, you're on a conspiracy site. Come on, maan!
I favor non editorialized titles. My comment explained there was no primary source. Your skepticism is your own responscibility.
It does not at all editorialize a title to clarify that the claim is being made by someone who has no established connection to the truth.
"Your skepticism is your own responsibility" is a huge part of what's wrong with how people consume information these days, because they are fed garbage with the truth buried in the comments and they don't bother to question it.
The purpose of a conspiracy forum is to find the truth, and you are deliberately obscuring it. You can do better.
If this turns out to be true, I want an apology for this high and mighty bullshit comment.