Is this Sullivan guy a false-false flag?
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
And who told you that Rebellion Baby is on the top of the pecking order? Who told you that she knows what's going on at the high level order? You did not answer the question. Why didn't they condemn the violence he promoted? They all supported the consequences of his actions. How is it that Americans call it again? Scapegoat? Rebellion Baby condemns the person, but justifies, supports and, most importantly, happily benefits from the consequences of his actions. The right was awfully damage from his actions, but the left gladly benefited from them.
Which ties? Says who again? It's pretty easy, isn't it? You have a provocateur you send to create violence and chaos. "Look, he's not one of us, he has ties to the far-right! We're innocent!" Which ties, again?
It is all documented there.
Read
It
You're likely a shill, so I will stop it here. If there was anything relevant to the argument you'd have posted already like you tried on your previous reply so you're now just deflecting. You did not answer the direct questions and from now on you will keep pretending you did by claiming the answers are on the tweet thread, when they are not.
To whoever read this, whoever is right will be clear in a few days. If Sullivan is a false flag, he won't see prison. If he's still useful to his handlers, he will walk. If he's no longer useful, he will "commit suicide". If he walks, watch whoever will free him and you will know whose side he's on. If he suicides, well, you already know which side does it to people who loses usefulness.
That does not make any sense at all.
I meant to say "not a false flag". I blame lack of coffee.