And people are calling it a false false flag. It was not. I know he was an infiltrator. People were talking about him a few days ago. 1) No such thing as a Trump supporter that would self-declare as a leftists anarchist and 2) No such thing as a Trump supporter that would self-declare a BLM supporter. You say Rebellion Baby denouncing him is somehow a proof that he's not on their side? I raise you two questions: Why didn't the Left condemn the violence, the riots, and the wanton destruction he was likely involved with? Why did they, instead, supported it, justified it, and even promoted it?
1)No such thing as a Trump supporter that would self-declare as a leftists anarchist and 2) No such thing as a Trump supporter that would self-declare a BLM supporter.
Says who? You?
You say Rebellion Baby denouncing him is somehow a proof that he's not on their side?
They provide shitload of evidence that he is an infiltrator and they did that MONTHS before the 6th. .
As I said, read the link.
Why didn't the Left condemn the violence, the riots, and the wanton destruction he was likely involved with?
Well:
John has been kicked from the #SaltLakeCity and #Portland protest scenes due to alarming behaviors including grifting/profiteering, self-promotion/clout chasing, sabotage of community actions, threats of violence, and — maybe most disturbingly — ties to the far-right.
They provide shitload of evidence that he is an infiltrator and they did that MONTHS before the 6th. .
And who told you that Rebellion Baby is on the top of the pecking order? Who told you that she knows what's going on at the high level order? You did not answer the question. Why didn't they condemn the violence he promoted? They all supported the consequences of his actions. How is it that Americans call it again? Scapegoat? Rebellion Baby condemns the person, but justifies, supports and, most importantly, happily benefits from the consequences of his actions. The right was awfully damage from his actions, but the left gladly benefited from them.
maybe most disturbingly — ties to the far-right.
Which ties? Says who again? It's pretty easy, isn't it? You have a provocateur you send to create violence and chaos. "Look, he's not one of us, he has ties to the far-right! We're innocent!" Which ties, again?
You're likely a shill, so I will stop it here. If there was anything relevant to the argument you'd have posted already like you tried on your previous reply so you're now just deflecting. You did not answer the direct questions and from now on you will keep pretending you did by claiming the answers are on the tweet thread, when they are not.
To whoever read this, whoever is right will be clear in a few days. If Sullivan is a false flag, he won't see prison. If he's still useful to his handlers, he will walk. If he's no longer useful, he will "commit suicide". If he walks, watch whoever will free him and you will know whose side he's on. If he suicides, well, you already know which side does it to people who loses usefulness.
And people are calling it a false false flag. It was not. I know he was an infiltrator. People were talking about him a few days ago. 1) No such thing as a Trump supporter that would self-declare as a leftists anarchist and 2) No such thing as a Trump supporter that would self-declare a BLM supporter. You say Rebellion Baby denouncing him is somehow a proof that he's not on their side? I raise you two questions: Why didn't the Left condemn the violence, the riots, and the wanton destruction he was likely involved with? Why did they, instead, supported it, justified it, and even promoted it?
Says who? You?
They provide shitload of evidence that he is an infiltrator and they did that MONTHS before the 6th. .
As I said, read the link.
Well:
BOOM
And who told you that Rebellion Baby is on the top of the pecking order? Who told you that she knows what's going on at the high level order? You did not answer the question. Why didn't they condemn the violence he promoted? They all supported the consequences of his actions. How is it that Americans call it again? Scapegoat? Rebellion Baby condemns the person, but justifies, supports and, most importantly, happily benefits from the consequences of his actions. The right was awfully damage from his actions, but the left gladly benefited from them.
Which ties? Says who again? It's pretty easy, isn't it? You have a provocateur you send to create violence and chaos. "Look, he's not one of us, he has ties to the far-right! We're innocent!" Which ties, again?
It is all documented there.
Read
It
You're likely a shill, so I will stop it here. If there was anything relevant to the argument you'd have posted already like you tried on your previous reply so you're now just deflecting. You did not answer the direct questions and from now on you will keep pretending you did by claiming the answers are on the tweet thread, when they are not.
To whoever read this, whoever is right will be clear in a few days. If Sullivan is a false flag, he won't see prison. If he's still useful to his handlers, he will walk. If he's no longer useful, he will "commit suicide". If he walks, watch whoever will free him and you will know whose side he's on. If he suicides, well, you already know which side does it to people who loses usefulness.