There are so many problems with this, starting with the obvious.
Italians speak Italian. They write in Italian.
Next, for anyone who's never been outside of the US, Europeans use the d/m/y format for their dates.
There is no official seal
There is no official letterhead
There is no printed name beneath the signature. These are required on legal documents in Italy as well
The ID shown on other sites, is well expired.
Confessional recordings aren't zoomed in. They record the entire room so that defense attorneys can't argue the defendant was being threatened out of view of the camera.
The recordings are also done with a stationary camera.
Paper ballots can't be hacked. The tabulating machines aren't connected to the internet.
First of all, only the first part of the video is shown here. The second half of the video is in Italian, so that Italians can understand what he’s saying. Also, the picture of the affidavit is a copy of the original one that is translated into English. They obviously had to make copies of it in English to send it to congress.
Full video: https://www.instagram.com/p/CJ1P3ayDeeP/
This affidavit also literally used the d/m/y date format. You were lying when you said it doesn’t. There also is a official letter head. You also do not need your name printed under your signature in legal documents in Italy. The affidavit also doesn’t need a seal, this can clearly be seen in a General affidavit template. I also don’t know what you mean when you say the id is expired, there is no id as far as I can see on this document.
The link you provided does in fact show the correct date format. There are others that aren't.
No, unequivocally no, the EU does not allow for the recordings to be zoomed in unless there are multiple angles simultaneously recording.
Next, as someone else had pointed out, this "affidavit" was presented to the Georgian Senate hearing in December 2020? But the date was January 2021? How?
Try as I might, from adjusting brightness and contrast I'm unable to see any official letterhead.
Yes, it would be sealed similarly to here in the USA with a notary to make it a legal document that this is a sworn legal statement given without coerce and if his free will in accordance with all local and state laws.
Go through this thread. Another person, who believes the election was wrong directed me to a 7 hour youtube video that they presented that affidavit and that occurred in December
I'll just finish with this. The voting machines that are used to cast votes, give printed paper receipts. In most States you can check the status of your vote. Pretty much everyone can check their vote for discrepancies. The tabulating machines that were used to scan paper ballots also can be checked. If this were in fact true, there would be an overwhelming amount of evidence.
Look, I get it. You guys really have an affinity for Donald Trump. You like him for whatever reasons you all have. To reach their own. And yes, I totally understand that need and desire to find any information that directly aligns with your own beliefs. And admittedly I voted for him in 16. But, honestly, before this election, how many of you would lend credence to these now leading voices that are putting this conspiracy out there? Many of these people that are making this current conspiracy have a long history of conspiracy theories. Are these credible people? Is what they're saying irrefutable? I truly hope you stay close to your loved ones.
"I disagree with what you said, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" -Voltaire
I'm glad we could have a cordial discussion.
First of all, the printed paper receipts show only the manipulated voting data.
Also, the voting machines have been audited and have been found to have a 68% error rate. In Fulton county alone, there was a error rate of 95%. This led to 95% of the vote being adjudicated, which basically means the poll workers could change the vote for 95% of the ballots in that county.
It's very easy to look up the official audit report. And the Republicans in in Fulton county certified the results. No error rating. You aren't telling the truth.
There are so many problems with this, starting with the obvious. Italians speak Italian. They write in Italian. Next, for anyone who's never been outside of the US, Europeans use the d/m/y format for their dates. There is no official seal There is no official letterhead There is no printed name beneath the signature. These are required on legal documents in Italy as well The ID shown on other sites, is well expired. Confessional recordings aren't zoomed in. They record the entire room so that defense attorneys can't argue the defendant was being threatened out of view of the camera. The recordings are also done with a stationary camera. Paper ballots can't be hacked. The tabulating machines aren't connected to the internet.
First of all, only the first part of the video is shown here. The second half of the video is in Italian, so that Italians can understand what he’s saying. Also, the picture of the affidavit is a copy of the original one that is translated into English. They obviously had to make copies of it in English to send it to congress. Full video: https://www.instagram.com/p/CJ1P3ayDeeP/
This affidavit also literally used the d/m/y date format. You were lying when you said it doesn’t. There also is a official letter head. You also do not need your name printed under your signature in legal documents in Italy. The affidavit also doesn’t need a seal, this can clearly be seen in a General affidavit template. I also don’t know what you mean when you say the id is expired, there is no id as far as I can see on this document.
Affidavit template: https://formdownload.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/General-Affidavit.pdf
Also, confessional recordings can be zoomed in.
https://mobile.twitter.com/OneAddyAdds/status/1347300940102172672/photo/2 I have the image on my phone but I guess I can't upload it? Idk. This is my first chat room experience. Sorry. Link provided though to his id
The link you provided does in fact show the correct date format. There are others that aren't. No, unequivocally no, the EU does not allow for the recordings to be zoomed in unless there are multiple angles simultaneously recording. Next, as someone else had pointed out, this "affidavit" was presented to the Georgian Senate hearing in December 2020? But the date was January 2021? How? Try as I might, from adjusting brightness and contrast I'm unable to see any official letterhead. Yes, it would be sealed similarly to here in the USA with a notary to make it a legal document that this is a sworn legal statement given without coerce and if his free will in accordance with all local and state laws.
This affidavit was not presented to the Georgia senate hearing in December of 2020, neither do confessional recordings have to be zoomed in.
Go through this thread. Another person, who believes the election was wrong directed me to a 7 hour youtube video that they presented that affidavit and that occurred in December
I'll just finish with this. The voting machines that are used to cast votes, give printed paper receipts. In most States you can check the status of your vote. Pretty much everyone can check their vote for discrepancies. The tabulating machines that were used to scan paper ballots also can be checked. If this were in fact true, there would be an overwhelming amount of evidence. Look, I get it. You guys really have an affinity for Donald Trump. You like him for whatever reasons you all have. To reach their own. And yes, I totally understand that need and desire to find any information that directly aligns with your own beliefs. And admittedly I voted for him in 16. But, honestly, before this election, how many of you would lend credence to these now leading voices that are putting this conspiracy out there? Many of these people that are making this current conspiracy have a long history of conspiracy theories. Are these credible people? Is what they're saying irrefutable? I truly hope you stay close to your loved ones. "I disagree with what you said, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" -Voltaire I'm glad we could have a cordial discussion.
First of all, the printed paper receipts show only the manipulated voting data.
Also, the voting machines have been audited and have been found to have a 68% error rate. In Fulton county alone, there was a error rate of 95%. This led to 95% of the vote being adjudicated, which basically means the poll workers could change the vote for 95% of the ballots in that county.
It's very easy to look up the official audit report. And the Republicans in in Fulton county certified the results. No error rating. You aren't telling the truth.