Just a question, your post history is about 80% Trump defense and cries about people who's views are not the same as you. Could one not interpret that as TDW type material if one was to objectively look at it?
It was just a question, apparently one you can't answer without signs of aggression and dismissal. I think that's one of the steps in the gentleman's guide to forum spies. Ah yes, number 18:
Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'
So I ask again, in the spirit of neutrality:
Your post history is about 80% Trump defense and cries about people who's views are not the same as you. Could one not interpret that as TDW type material if one was to objectively look at it?
Just a question, your post history is about 80% Trump defense and cries about people who's views are not the same as you. Could one not interpret that as TDW type material if one was to objectively look at it?
It was just a question, apparently one you can't answer without signs of aggression and dismissal. I think that's one of the steps in the gentleman's guide to forum spies. Ah yes, number 18:
So I ask again, in the spirit of neutrality:
Your post history is about 80% Trump defense and cries about people who's views are not the same as you. Could one not interpret that as TDW type material if one was to objectively look at it?
Funny you should say that, I've been a wrestler in the past! Too bad I can't now because of Covid.