2004: CDC Study:
Age at First Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination in Children With Autism and School-Matched Control Subjects: A Population-Based Study in Metropolitan Atlanta
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14754936
2014, CDC whistleblower press release:
"...i regret my coauthors and i omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in journal Pediatrics. the omitted data suggested AA males who received MMR vaccine before age 36 mo were at increased risk for autism..."
~ Dr William Thompson, CDC whistleblower
https://i.redd.it/1rb482xb9ty41.png
2014, CDC statement on CDC whistleblower:
The study looked at different age groups: children vaccinated by 18 months, 24 months, and 36 months. The findings revealed that vaccination between 24 and 36 months was "slightly" more common among children with autism, and that association was strongest among children 3-5 years of age. The authors reported this finding was most likely a result of immunization requirements for preschool special education program attendance in children with autism.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html
So instead of retracting the admitted fraud, in 2014 the CDC decided to double-down, and claim (without evidence) that the reason vaccines are linked to autism is because autism causes vaccines
The CDC could not show where a single child in their study had ever attended any special needs pre-school, or was vaccinated because of that preschool.
The CDC went on to claim (without evidence) that their fraudulent study had been properly replicated (per the scientific method) which appears to be another false statement, since nobody can find the newer studies that replicated the fraudulent CDC study.
And instead of Snopes admitting the CDC whistleblower claim was true, Snopes decided to call it “false” based on something someone else did with the data that the CDC decided fo omit.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bad-medicine/
And instead of addressing the facts that the CDC whistleblower disclosed, the notorious pro-vaccine shill Dr David Gorski went for the ad hominem attack, and said Dr William Thompson was “anti-vaccine”, as if that somehow makes Thompson less credible.
Quote:
"Oh my God, i cannot believe that we did what we did, but we did it. It's all there. This is the lowest point in my career, that I went along with that paper. I have great shame now when I meet families of kids with autism, because I have been part of the problem"
~ Dr William Thompson, CDC whistleblower
Wait so ...Jenny McCarthy was right ??
I never knew who Jenny McCarthy was until after I had been immersed in the vaccine debate for quite some time.
After hearing her name dropped (by people like you) enough times, I finally looked her up and was blown away.
I think many people assume beautiful women are bimbos, but I found her to be very articulate and well spoken.
Jenny McCarthy is like a lot of "anti-vaccine" activists, who were once pro-vaccine enough to vaccinate their kids, but then when their kid had an "adverse reaction" she went down the rabbit hole.
Today, AUTISM is the single biggest motivator for anti-vaccine activism on twitter, by a huge margin.
Image: https://i.redd.it/9bkmq1aott6z.jpg
Source: https://www.wired.com/2015/06/antivaxxers-influencing-legislation/
Your username makes me sad, lost a sibling to Sids.
when i was a kid, my moms friend had a baby, and soon thereafter the baby died of "SIDS".
I also learned that this was not the first child she had lost to SIDS.
kids being kids, i thought the word "SIDS" was funny and giggled about it, but the concept of SIDS stuck with me.
she had 5 healthy girls, but both of the boys she had died of SIDS.
I had never paid much attention to vaccines or immunity, and didn't get involved with the research or the debate, figuring that there were lots of smart people working on these problems...
until August 27, 2014, which was the day of the CDC whistleblower press release
https://i.redd.it/1rb482xb9ty41.png
By what i can only attribute to divine intervention, or an amazing coincidence, I just happened to google "vaccines autism" exactly 8 hours after the CDC whistleblower press release was dropped, and so I went down the vaccine-autism rabbit hole within hours of the press release, and so i was able to watch first hand how it was handled.
I was able to observe both sides of the debate, to follow every lead offered by both sides, to immerse myself in the technical vocabulary, to immerse myself in the theory of operation, etc
And I was amazed at how the vaccine critics, the so-called "anti-vaxxers" were able to run circles around the experts, making them look like bumbling idiots. The anti-vaxxers would invariable cite, and link, to sources, for the lurkers to follow and judge on their own merits. The pro-vaxxers would invariably rely on parroting vague, unsubstantiated talking points.
There seemed to me to be a pattern, whereby if a baby got their vaccines at a very young age, or if a baby got more than one vaccine at once, there was a increased chance of an "adverse reaction"
When I say "more than one vaccine at once" I mean a multi-vaccine like an MMR, or DTP, and especially if more than one multi-vaccine was given at once, which I was shocked to learn was a very common practice.
Also, its worth noting that the phrases "averse reactions" and "side effects" are, in my opinion, deliberately introduced for the sole purpose of obfuscating amateur research. If you aren't familiar with the phrase "adverse reaction", then your google search is effectively over before it even begins.
So I kept "researching" and listening to parents first-hand accounts of what happened to their child, and there was this phenomenon that I kept noticing, that I didn't have a proper medical term for. The phenomenon seemed to be, that previous vaccines would sensitize the immune system to subsequent vaccines.
It was a Eureka moment when i discovered the term "Anaphylaxis"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaphylaxis
And it occurred to me that, If they already have a proper medical term for this phenomenon, then they already know that this phenomenon happens.
And if they already know, then they can't plead ignorance,
Which indicates to me a wide-scale cover-up.
So along the way, I'd find countless examples of this phenomenon whereby a kid gets too many vaccines at once, and then dies soon thereafter.
I didn't have a proper medical name for it, so I just said "vaccines kill kids"
One day, a vaccine shill was trying way too hard to "debunk" the claim that too many vaccines had killed this child, and she tried to dismiss it as "SIDS"
As if she would know?
And then the light bulb went off in my head, that vaccines caused SIDS...
https://i.redd.it/7xgs828yy5f21.jpg
And it occurred to me that this shill obviously knew that vaccines caused "SIDS", and that she was knowingly, wantonly, trying to obfuscate the debate.
If anyone has a twitter, please send this shill a nice polite tweet, thanking her for being an incompetent shill, and accidentally telling the whole world that vaccines cause SIDS
https://twitter.com/handmadekathy
But the story doesn't end there.
Because, not only do vaccines cause SIDS, but it seems to me that the entire concept of "SIDS" was specifically invented for the sole purpose of writing off the infant deaths that were caused by vaccines.
It is inconceivable that in 2021, we have this phenomenon whereby an infant drops dead, and the medical establishment just collectively shrugs their shoulders, and claims they don't know why, and furthermore, that they obviously don't care to find out why.
In any other death, they will expend limitless resources to try and get to the bottom of any untimely death. They will open a 40 year old "cold case" if they think they can prosecute a perp.
But when it comes to an untimely death that happens mere hours after a vaccine overdose, suddenly their professional curiosity ceases to exist. They claim they can't conceive of any biologically plausible way that the vaccine overdose could have anything to do with the death, in spite of specifically ruling out all other potential causes of death.
So here they are, with a dead 6 month old baby, and are perfectly content to just write it off as "SIDS", and have no sense of responsibility to get to the bottom of what actually causes "SIDS"?
So what does cause SIDS?
The official story is that SIDS is caused by the baby sleeping on whichever side the baby happens to be sleeping on when they die.
Baby died sleeping on his belly? Yup, classic SIDS. Shame on parents for letting baby sleep on his belly.
Baby died sleeping on his back? Yup, classic SIDS. Shame on parents for letting baby sleep on his back.
So, not only do parents suffer the loss of their child at the hands of vaccine quacks, but then the quacks turn around and blame the parents for their child's death.
The vaccine quacks like to say that parents of children with "genetic problems" are apt to try and squirm out of their own role and responsibility in their child's adverse reaction, by blaming the very vaccines that they just gave their child,
Without ever acknowledging the possibility that vaccine quacks might be apt to try and squirm out of their role and responsibility in the child's adverse reaction, by blaming bad genetics, while ignoring the vaccines that they just gave the child!
Millions of years of human evolution. Thousands of years of medical observation. And somehow nobody ever noticed that when a baby sleeps on a certain side, they are more likely to die?
SIDS was only "discovered" and described in the last few decades. It used to be called "crib death", and it was so rare that it was virtually unheard of.
And by the time I'm in 4rd grade, I know a lady who lost TWO kids to SIDS?
Furthermore, there is this remarkable phenomenon whereby any "adverse reaction" that is alleged to be cause by vaccines, is further studied and magically found to be prevented by the very vaccines in question!
Claim: vaccines cause Alzheimers
Magic Study: vaccines prevent Alzheimers!
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/07/27/894731147/flu-shot-and-pneumonia-vaccine-might-reduce-alzheimers-risk-research-shows
Claim: vaccines cause allergies
Magic Study: vaccines prevent allergies
https://youtu.be/b03U6BYF9L0?t=144
Claim: vaccines cause autism
Magic Study: vaccines prevent autism!
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-11-340
Claim: vaccines cause SIDS
Magic study: vaccines prevent SIDS!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X07002800
Claim: vaccines cause autoimmune disease
Magic study: vaccines prevent autoimmune disease!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28888842
Claim: vaccines cause asthma
Magic study: vaccines prevent asthma!
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/asthma/symptoms-causes/syc-20369653
One of the well-known hallmarks of pseudoscientific quackery is "claims of widespread usefulness"
So, not only will these vaccine prevent MMR, TDP, etc...
These vaccines will also prevent Autism, SIDS, Alzheimers, Autoimmune diseases, Allergies, Asthma, ...
https://i.redd.it/znu05lwz0ao41.jpg
My mother totally believed the lie she killed her own son by positioning him wrong. This is unreal. I believe in divine intervention that reveals certain truths to us at just the right time. Wow. Thank you so so much for taking the time to write this post with your findings.
Wow thank you for taking the time to write up all that info. I’ve never looked at the other side of the vaccine debate and have always dismissed the anti-vaxxers. But after going through 2020 and learning about how much lies and misinformation there are in the mainstream media and the “trusted institutions”, I’ve been more open to seeing the other side of things.
I myself have been going through the rabbit hole trying to learn. After looking at the studies and science, I do see there is very probable link between vaccines and autism, in addition to other health problems that arise after vaccination. You made a good observation how whenever there is a controversy of whether vaccine is causing something, they magically come out with a study that states the opposite. There are a lot of scientific studies that are unfortunately not reliable nowadays because of conflict of interest and monetary motivations.
It’s scary how they vilify and dismiss those who are just trying to tell the truth about things. What they’ve been doing to anti-vaccine people is the same thing they were doing to the HCQ doctors.
Holy shit, this is brilliant.
I love how you obviously started out without a medical background, but you researched and reasoned your way to knowing more about this than probably 99% of doctors.
SIDS has always been a big mystery for me, and I was skeptical about your claim at first, but your explanation totally won me over. It's exactly the kind of thing they would do to explain something they didn't want truly explained.
And yes, there are tons of "spoof" studies out there to keep people thinking what they're supposed to think. Just try to find the Harvard paper that proves smoking cuts Parkinson's risk in half...you'll find more articles that say smoking makes it worse without even offering any proof.
Thanks again. You should make another post specifically about SIDS.
Nice