Nope. The only real currency is the motion that defines all existence as moving from a beginning towards an end, and the highest value within is the ONE who can evaluate ALL around him, which represents ones free will of choice.
Money was introduced as a substitute value to trick one to consent to ignore ones own free will to evaluate,which then deceived us to believe in a substitute currency defining our existence.
The only way to gain control over others within the energy of motion, is to trick them to ignore themselves. Now are the few really in "control" over the many; or are the many just selfishly ignoring that ALL is freely offered to each ONE?
INTRIN'SICALLY, adverb Internally - "in its nature". Then why does "money" require your consent of evaluation? The nature of value represents ONEs free will of choice to evaluate ALL around him.
mediums of exchange
And what did "money" exchange from its inception until now? ONEs value to evaluate ALL; to ONEs total devaluation within ALL, on behest on other (((ones))), defining the substitute value for oneself called money, as usury based fiat currency, backed by "nothing" of any value; while burying also burying each one believing in it under exponentially increasing debt, while also managing to deceiving the majority to consent to substitute value for every thing else in existence; including so called "intellectual property" (through the copyright racket), which manages to put participation in culture, behind a paywall.
Imagine the ignorance towards reality to allow others to define participation in the act of creation for oneself...
items for actual purposes, and the represented work
Isn't all else in existence inspiration for one to sustain oneself, and isn't the reason why we "work" to uphold life over death aka adhering to self sustenance? Doesn't the fruit of our labor created unity with others and shared responsibility under the same intent of self sustenance?
How could any of that work if ones adheres to a substitute value for oneself? Did I by chance mention that no other life-forms use money, that the majority of our own species has no money (poverty) and that the so called rich don't actually use money, because they own everything that we believe costs money?
The question is..will the selfish ever acknowledge enough contradictions to reality to question their own selfish ignorance?
So originally money wasn’t a trick
Because the few who wanted to control the many, while having the means to roll out this humanitarian exchange medium of values onto the world, couldn't possibly know beforehand how offering a substitute value to those who have the free will of choice to evaluate everything, would lead to the devaluation of self, while flushing all the ignored value into the hands of the few who want to control the many.
Do you comprehend what causes corruption? Motion corrupts all existence within motion. Reality is defined by being within motion and so if one ignores creation (like for example ones own free will of choice; ones own means to evaluate), then motion will corrupt it, and what do you know...money has become worthless; an existential threat; leveraged by the few to prevent the many to even participate in existence.
And al this just because the selfish don#t want to question their beliefs; their self imposed restrictions of comprehending a reality based on motion. Something, something..."ignorance is bliss".
it was just fair exchange
A fair exchange offered to ignorant slaves by their criminal masters. What could possibly go wrong if one consents to the false authority of another one, while ignoring ones own sole authority over self (the free will of choice) for it? Let me guess...next you tell me that we need leaders to sustain ourselves?
You’re right about Fiat currency though, however. It was a trick, and that was only possible due to force of government, deception, and banning of real money.
What if those few who want everything, are not in total ignorance of the consequences of their own actions, and instead take their sweet ass calculations into account, before rolling out their criminal rackets increments, based on comprehending the odds of being the few, while racketeering and enslaving the many?
You got to be a little more cautious when you try to kill a giant with pinpricks...
they are the ones who control the money flows
Nope. The only real currency is the motion that defines all existence as moving from a beginning towards an end, and the highest value within is the ONE who can evaluate ALL around him, which represents ones free will of choice.
Money was introduced as a substitute value to trick one to consent to ignore ones own free will to evaluate,which then deceived us to believe in a substitute currency defining our existence.
The only way to gain control over others within the energy of motion, is to trick them to ignore themselves. Now are the few really in "control" over the many; or are the many just selfishly ignoring that ALL is freely offered to each ONE?
Actually real “money” has intrinsic value.
INTRIN'SICALLY, adverb Internally - "in its nature". Then why does "money" require your consent of evaluation? The nature of value represents ONEs free will of choice to evaluate ALL around him.
mediums of exchange
And what did "money" exchange from its inception until now? ONEs value to evaluate ALL; to ONEs total devaluation within ALL, on behest on other (((ones))), defining the substitute value for oneself called money, as usury based fiat currency, backed by "nothing" of any value; while burying also burying each one believing in it under exponentially increasing debt, while also managing to deceiving the majority to consent to substitute value for every thing else in existence; including so called "intellectual property" (through the copyright racket), which manages to put participation in culture, behind a paywall.
Imagine the ignorance towards reality to allow others to define participation in the act of creation for oneself...
items for actual purposes, and the represented work
Isn't all else in existence inspiration for one to sustain oneself, and isn't the reason why we "work" to uphold life over death aka adhering to self sustenance? Doesn't the fruit of our labor created unity with others and shared responsibility under the same intent of self sustenance?
How could any of that work if ones adheres to a substitute value for oneself? Did I by chance mention that no other life-forms use money, that the majority of our own species has no money (poverty) and that the so called rich don't actually use money, because they own everything that we believe costs money?
The question is..will the selfish ever acknowledge enough contradictions to reality to question their own selfish ignorance?
So originally money wasn’t a trick
Because the few who wanted to control the many, while having the means to roll out this humanitarian exchange medium of values onto the world, couldn't possibly know beforehand how offering a substitute value to those who have the free will of choice to evaluate everything, would lead to the devaluation of self, while flushing all the ignored value into the hands of the few who want to control the many.
Do you comprehend what causes corruption? Motion corrupts all existence within motion. Reality is defined by being within motion and so if one ignores creation (like for example ones own free will of choice; ones own means to evaluate), then motion will corrupt it, and what do you know...money has become worthless; an existential threat; leveraged by the few to prevent the many to even participate in existence.
And al this just because the selfish don#t want to question their beliefs; their self imposed restrictions of comprehending a reality based on motion. Something, something..."ignorance is bliss".
it was just fair exchange
A fair exchange offered to ignorant slaves by their criminal masters. What could possibly go wrong if one consents to the false authority of another one, while ignoring ones own sole authority over self (the free will of choice) for it? Let me guess...next you tell me that we need leaders to sustain ourselves?
You’re right about Fiat currency though, however. It was a trick, and that was only possible due to force of government, deception, and banning of real money.
What if those few who want everything, are not in total ignorance of the consequences of their own actions, and instead take their sweet ass calculations into account, before rolling out their criminal rackets increments, based on comprehending the odds of being the few, while racketeering and enslaving the many?
You got to be a little more cautious when you try to kill a giant with pinpricks...