Yeah says snopes. It's obviously not just this one clip that disproves the moon landing. It's this clip in addition to other outliers that make it less likely that we had the technology at that time to safely send humans outside of lower orbit.
To clarify, I think the landing is faked, but sometimes you have to admit when certain evidence is weak. Like you say, there is a ton of evidence to choose from.
What about Don Pettit in his smooth brain voice. “I would love to go to the moon but unfortuantly we destoryed the technology to go there and it’s a painful process to build it up again.”
No, because the cost for a Saturn V rocket is exceedingly high and was impossible to keep going. You have to remember that the 70's oil embargo destroyed budgets and the public by and large forced NASA to strip budgets and focus on 're-usable' rocket technology. Thus the Shuttle.
It's easy to think you know all the answers until you realize you're projecting your own bias and idiocy into a proven fact. Man went to the moon and returned with moon rocks.
There is a laser mirror that was placed by the last Apollo mission to make measuring distance possible.
Grow up, be a man and educate yourself to one of man's greatest achievements.
The moon rock we gave Holland is a confirmed fake and out of the 270 that were given to other nations, approx. 180 are unaccounted for. Probably thrown away because they are worthless. There is also a list on Wikipedia of meteorites that have been identified as originating from the moon. These "samples" have literally fallen to earth many times. How lucky!
We shot lasers at the moon starting in 1962 to measure distance, years before any Apollo missions. So the fact you say the mirror "makes measuring distance possible" is a complete lie, they even say it was only to "increase accuracy". Worked perfectly fine before a mirror was placed there by humans who didn't even have the proper gear to survive the radiation or extreme temperatures on the moon.
Laser ranging on the moon had been carried out in the 50's without the use of reflectors. The moon is a fantastic reflector as demonstrated by it's appearance during both the night and day times.
Given the distance involved, the spread of the beam occurring in each direction of travel, the sender and the reflector both traveling at incredible distances and speeds, both bodies being in a state of rotation, and the fact that photons travel in a straight line, I'd need to see some pretty convincing evidence indicating that they are able to accurately resolve a reflector smaller than a beach umbrella.
It's for these very same reasons that we have yet to create a telescope on earth that can resolve such detail as to permanently lay to rest the question of "did man walk on the moon?" through observable and tangible evidence of a bunch of lawn chairs and tinfoil moon furniture.
The moon could just be a projection for all anyone really knows.
Its looks circular to me...sometimes crescent shaped but I have yet to see it as anything solid.
Little girl : why havent we been back to the moon?
Drunk (senile?) Buzz Aldrin: oh because we never went...
This is kinda taken out of context and shouldn't be used to prove or disprove anything since it is weak evidence.
Yeah says snopes. It's obviously not just this one clip that disproves the moon landing. It's this clip in addition to other outliers that make it less likely that we had the technology at that time to safely send humans outside of lower orbit.
To clarify, I think the landing is faked, but sometimes you have to admit when certain evidence is weak. Like you say, there is a ton of evidence to choose from.
Ma man
What about Don Pettit in his smooth brain voice. “I would love to go to the moon but unfortuantly we destoryed the technology to go there and it’s a painful process to build it up again.”
No, because the cost for a Saturn V rocket is exceedingly high and was impossible to keep going. You have to remember that the 70's oil embargo destroyed budgets and the public by and large forced NASA to strip budgets and focus on 're-usable' rocket technology. Thus the Shuttle.
It's easy to think you know all the answers until you realize you're projecting your own bias and idiocy into a proven fact. Man went to the moon and returned with moon rocks.
There is a laser mirror that was placed by the last Apollo mission to make measuring distance possible.
Grow up, be a man and educate yourself to one of man's greatest achievements.
The moon rock we gave Holland is a confirmed fake and out of the 270 that were given to other nations, approx. 180 are unaccounted for. Probably thrown away because they are worthless. There is also a list on Wikipedia of meteorites that have been identified as originating from the moon. These "samples" have literally fallen to earth many times. How lucky! We shot lasers at the moon starting in 1962 to measure distance, years before any Apollo missions. So the fact you say the mirror "makes measuring distance possible" is a complete lie, they even say it was only to "increase accuracy". Worked perfectly fine before a mirror was placed there by humans who didn't even have the proper gear to survive the radiation or extreme temperatures on the moon.
Are you being ironic?
Laser ranging on the moon had been carried out in the 50's without the use of reflectors. The moon is a fantastic reflector as demonstrated by it's appearance during both the night and day times.
Given the distance involved, the spread of the beam occurring in each direction of travel, the sender and the reflector both traveling at incredible distances and speeds, both bodies being in a state of rotation, and the fact that photons travel in a straight line, I'd need to see some pretty convincing evidence indicating that they are able to accurately resolve a reflector smaller than a beach umbrella.
It's for these very same reasons that we have yet to create a telescope on earth that can resolve such detail as to permanently lay to rest the question of "did man walk on the moon?" through observable and tangible evidence of a bunch of lawn chairs and tinfoil moon furniture.
The moon could just be a projection for all anyone really knows. Its looks circular to me...sometimes crescent shaped but I have yet to see it as anything solid.