I think you misunderstood the question. We agree obomba was shit, I’m sure we agree bush was worse, and I’m sure we agree that bill clinton is a rapist (infowars.con), am I correct?
Thus the presidency was subverted, like the rest of the west, a long time ago.
If trump isn’t (part of) the path out of the dark, what do you think is? And you can’t say kamala
How is "Obomba" shitty enough to get a nickname for killing civilians but Trump doing it MUCH MORE OFTEN doesn’t make him objectively worse in this respect ? Like at least have some consistency here.
I fully support anti war candidates who don’t eagerly drone strike civilians. It’s a shame more Americans don’t.
Are you pretending to be retarded? Trump was, both times, an anti-war candidate. So by your own logic you should have supported him. Nice job dodging the question though you’d make a master debater
We’re probably more on the same page than you think, but here’s the thing, if it ain’t trump, what do you believe in?
Not drone striking civilians?
I think you misunderstood the question. We agree obomba was shit, I’m sure we agree bush was worse, and I’m sure we agree that bill clinton is a rapist (infowars.con), am I correct?
Thus the presidency was subverted, like the rest of the west, a long time ago.
If trump isn’t (part of) the path out of the dark, what do you think is? And you can’t say kamala
How is "Obomba" shitty enough to get a nickname for killing civilians but Trump doing it MUCH MORE OFTEN doesn’t make him objectively worse in this respect ? Like at least have some consistency here.
I fully support anti war candidates who don’t eagerly drone strike civilians. It’s a shame more Americans don’t.
Are you pretending to be retarded? Trump was, both times, an anti-war candidate. So by your own logic you should have supported him. Nice job dodging the question though you’d make a master debater