I agree with the last part but the only difference is they are openly communist and are activly defending that idea.
I went through a twitter thread just yesterday with avg. 500 ppl claiming that the idea "China = authoritarian" is just capatalist propaganda and aktualy "china = good utopia."
Very very few here are even remotely racist, more less, nazi or fascist or authoritarian. (And they usually get picked on)
Very very few here are even remotely racist, more less, nazi or fascist or authoritarian.
Eh, a lot of folks on thedonald these days have been promoting unilateral executive actions like martial law and public executions. The rest of the community does not argue against this, or if they do the mods must be censoring them.
So, I think there's certainly a similar case to be made for both sides. But that said, I agree with MagaPede69. It's neither very accurate, nor helpful, to lean on such labels to shout down the side you don't agree with.
I was referring to conspiracy win, and not the donald.
Reddit conspiracy is a whole other culture.
Major reddit mods are communist and sway their ideological ban hammers over all the boards. It's not an insult, it's what they openly align themselves to.
Win conspiracy isnt the same on a polar spectrum. It is simply free speech.
To point out the Donald has a group with violent rehtoric is fine. I absolutely dont belive that should be in the realm of no no think or wrong speak. Its true.
And I am an active "The Donald" pede ftom its reddit days.
They're communists... you're fascists. The truth is neither, but your rhetoric (and theirs) isn't helpful.
I agree with the last part but the only difference is they are openly communist and are activly defending that idea.
I went through a twitter thread just yesterday with avg. 500 ppl claiming that the idea "China = authoritarian" is just capatalist propaganda and aktualy "china = good utopia."
Very very few here are even remotely racist, more less, nazi or fascist or authoritarian. (And they usually get picked on)
Eh, a lot of folks on thedonald these days have been promoting unilateral executive actions like martial law and public executions. The rest of the community does not argue against this, or if they do the mods must be censoring them.
So, I think there's certainly a similar case to be made for both sides. But that said, I agree with MagaPede69. It's neither very accurate, nor helpful, to lean on such labels to shout down the side you don't agree with.
Agree on some things.
I was referring to conspiracy win, and not the donald.
Reddit conspiracy is a whole other culture.
Major reddit mods are communist and sway their ideological ban hammers over all the boards. It's not an insult, it's what they openly align themselves to.
Win conspiracy isnt the same on a polar spectrum. It is simply free speech.
To point out the Donald has a group with violent rehtoric is fine. I absolutely dont belive that should be in the realm of no no think or wrong speak. Its true.
And I am an active "The Donald" pede ftom its reddit days.
Ah I see, I didn't understand that you were talking specifically about r/conspiracy vs conspiracy.win, despite that being the topic of the post.
You should read what I wrote again, friend. The meaning seems to have been misinterpreted.
Fascists are National Socialists
Get help faggot. You know we can find you here, right?