Now I'm not saying we never landed a spacecraft on the moon, I don't see any reason to not believe that however the claim that we put living breathing humans on the moon in the 60's and yet NO country has been able to replicate that in 50 years even with all out technological and material advancements is quite laughable if you think about it.
because of all the counter evidence showing how unlikely/impossible the different feats were
there is massive incentive for another powerhouse country like China to put a man on the moon, all they do is dickwave. So that doesn't pass the BS test either.
Screw all of the workers being okay with it, why wouldn't Russia say something? The PR coup of exposing an American lie on that scale during the vietnam war would've burned America to the ground.
and yet NO country has been able to replicate that in 50 years
Able, or Willing?
Ask yourself this one simple question. Of all the Astronauts that went around the moon, how many had kids?
radiation out there is brutal
sterilization is a side effect of radiation
Would you be surprised to know that there was a conspiracy of secrecy about the Moon landings. The they chose men who were already incapable of having children in the first place. But since this doesn't paint a very "heroic", or should I say "fertile", image it was kept secret.
*Able, according to modern NASA engineers they have to solve how to get through the Van Allen radiation belt if they're to send someone to the moon or mars. Why do they need to solve that? They did it with 60's technology.
Also according to those same people the radiation should be so strong with the lack of protection the old craft had that it would have killed the astronauts shortly after. Being sterile would be the least of their worries.
Have you ever looked at a picture of the lunar lander? It's literally put together with duct tape. You think that piece of junk adequately shielded astronauts from space debris and deadly amounts of radiation?
Now I'm not saying we never landed a spacecraft on the moon, I don't see any reason to not believe that however the claim that we put living breathing humans on the moon in the 60's and yet NO country has been able to replicate that in 50 years even with all out technological and material advancements is quite laughable if you think about it.
Besides the apollo missions no one has ever left low earth orbit. Ie no one else has gone through the van allen radiation belts.
I don't buy it,
Yes that's what I would suggest, reading the article I linked and also watching this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpuKu3F0BvY&t=37s
both present very convincing arguments
Screw all of the workers being okay with it, why wouldn't Russia say something? The PR coup of exposing an American lie on that scale during the vietnam war would've burned America to the ground.
Able, or Willing?
Ask yourself this one simple question. Of all the Astronauts that went around the moon, how many had kids?
Would you be surprised to know that there was a conspiracy of secrecy about the Moon landings. The they chose men who were already incapable of having children in the first place. But since this doesn't paint a very "heroic", or should I say "fertile", image it was kept secret.
Did you read the article???
*Able, according to modern NASA engineers they have to solve how to get through the Van Allen radiation belt if they're to send someone to the moon or mars. Why do they need to solve that? They did it with 60's technology.
Also according to those same people the radiation should be so strong with the lack of protection the old craft had that it would have killed the astronauts shortly after. Being sterile would be the least of their worries.
Have you ever looked at a picture of the lunar lander? It's literally put together with duct tape. You think that piece of junk adequately shielded astronauts from space debris and deadly amounts of radiation?
So you admit I'm on topic,
you just unhappy I'm not traveling in the direction that you want.
So you're saying they chose men who were sterile to cover the effects radiation would have so that their story is more believable?
I mean that wouldn't surprise me, I also wouldn't be surprised if the government sterilized them by force.
Is that a technical or psychological term?